Talk:Talang 2007/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * I am sorry that you have had to wait so long for a review, but as this nomination had not been listed at WP:GAN, no-one knew that you were seeking review. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I made a number of copy-edits, also adding citation and other tags.
 * Apart from that, the prose is "reasonably well written".
 * Article is sufficiently MoS compliant
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I fixed three and tagged three dead links, using WP:CHECKLINKS.
 * There are some statements that I tagged as needing citations.
 * Those references that I could access were verifiable,reliable sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article covers the subject in reasonable depth and is focussed upon it.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * There are a few unsupported statements that I tagged as lacking a WP:NPOV.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for seven days, for above issues to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I note that the nominator is blocked indefinitely so I shall fail this nomination as they cannot address the issues raised. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for seven days, for above issues to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I note that the nominator is blocked indefinitely so I shall fail this nomination as they cannot address the issues raised. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)