Talk:Talk Dirty (album)

Orphaned references in Talk Dirty (album)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Talk Dirty (album)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ReferenceA": From Tattoos (album): http://www.rap-up.com/2014/03/17/album-cover-jason-derulo-talk-dirty/ From The Voice (U.S. season 6):  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed merger with Tattoos (album)
I don't get why Tattoos and Talk Dirty are two separate articles as they both have the same songs, singles, and labels. I think that Talk Dirty should be merged with Tattoos because they are the same album. User:Adamtb24 16:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose merge. This is a well-written article. Most reissued albums on Wikipedia have separate articles. The Fame/The Fame Monster and Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded/Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up are two examples. Carbrera (talk) 01:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose merge, I agree with Carbrera, if we did merge Tattoos and Talk Dirty then we'd have to do that to Good Girl Gone Bad and Good Girl Gone Bad: Reloaded, The Fame and The Fame Monster etc. as it can be one rule for this and another for that also wouldn't the reader find it boring having to scroll down to read about Talk Dirty?Thakillabeatz (talk) 09:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Support merge. Well, consider the facts, The Fame Monster is more of an EP than a reissue album (despite it later being released with "The Fame" later, and Good Girl Gone Bad: Reloaded and Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up have brand new tracks for the album. Talk Dirty and Tattoos do not. What I was suggesting is maybe make a small information box on Tatoos with information about Talk Dirty, but you have right of your opinion and I do respect that. User:Adamtb24 6:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose Not really the same album as this doesn't include the whole album track listing. I heart Rita Ora (talk) 09:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Support merge. It's the exact same album -no new tracks, not even remixes or dance versions, even the special edition cover art of Tattoos is similar save for the name on it- it wasn't even re-released as an EP. It was just rearranged and re-released with some tracks subtracted from the original Tattoos album. In my opinion, it doesn't worth having an article of it's own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.165.20.179 (talk) 12:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose merge. I agree with Carbrera, he have already said my point. Vitor  AzBine  14:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose I agree with what Carbrera is talking about. Musicedit98 (talk) 03:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose merge. This is literally his third studio album in the US (his relevant market, aka where he's from), not some re-issue like wikipedia randomly claims it to be. 4 out of 11 songs are different and Tattoos was not even released in the US. BlaccCrab (talk) 15:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)