Talk:Talud-tablero

Project importance rating
I haven't assessed the importance because I am not sure. As the dominant style of Teotihuacan and an important geopolitical indicator at other sites, I am tempted to rate it mid, but should it be considered more important that the buildings it describes? Eluchil404 13:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I think mid should be ok- we've architectural overview articles for cultures (eg Maya architecture) as high, and this is probably one of the better-known architectural elements. Also, as an element you can run across it in a number of contexts and geographically-separated sites/regions, so in a way it's needed 'more', than say something which is purely a localised phenom. --cjllw | TALK  13:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)