Talk:Tanah Merah MRT station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 02:39, 1 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello? @ZKang123?  Brachy 08  (Talk) 05:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thing is there are no non-primary sources when it comes to describing the station locations. ZKang123 (talk) 09:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Chiming in here having recently witnessed a mess with a similar point of contention: a primary source is not automatically unreliable because it is primary in nature; it can contain encyclopedic information that cannot be found elsewhere, in which case it is likely the best source for that information. Specifically for their use here, train operating hours and intervals, as well as locations in geographical proximity to stations, fall under straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge (from WP:PRIMARY). ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 09:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Fair enough.  Brachy 08  (Talk) 00:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I’ll pass it.  Brachy 08  (Talk) 00:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section):
 * b (inline citations to reliable sources):, FN 32-33 are primary sources, try finding secondary sources for them.
 * c (OR):
 * d (copyvio and plagiarism):, checked with Earwig’s tool.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects):
 * b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Not so much bias.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No edit wars here.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):, all images are own work, and have their CC tags.
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No issues so far! Just fix the non-primary source problem and you’re good to go! I left out FN 28 and 29, but it is best to find non-primary sources for them, but I’ll let them pass, it’s a GA review after all.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No issues so far! Just fix the non-primary source problem and you’re good to go! I left out FN 28 and 29, but it is best to find non-primary sources for them, but I’ll let them pass, it’s a GA review after all.
 * No issues so far! Just fix the non-primary source problem and you’re good to go! I left out FN 28 and 29, but it is best to find non-primary sources for them, but I’ll let them pass, it’s a GA review after all.