Talk:Tanisha Williams

Peer review
Overall this page is well complete. Some critiques I have are a few spots where the grammar is a bit clunky, some of the citations link to things that aren't very clear in what exactly they are supporting and it would be nice to have a photo. Particular citations would the first citation of source 1, does this page just say she's a botanist? is it necessary to cite that when you have cited so many other sources about her research? the other would be the first citing of source. It isn't clear what information it is providing, perhaps moving it closer to what exactly you're drawing from it could make it more clear. My final critique would beof putting #BlackBotanistsWeek in the Lead. Without the hashtag having its own article to link it seems like there should be more information on the # since putting in the lead makes it seems like it will be more represented than it is in the body of the page. I would also recommend touching more on her activism and what her motivations and goals are since you're sources discuss this but your activism section seems to just rephrase the lead discussion about her found the hashtag. The grammar should be no problem to fix with a read over, there wasn't much but the sentence "For her doctoral research, she studied plant adaptability to climate change, and the ability to predict plant adaptability to climate change, focusing on plants in the Pelargonium genus growing in the Cape Floristic Region in South Africa." is particularly confusing and you should rework it. Godawgs598 (talk) 22:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)