Talk:Tanushree Dutta

Downfall Section
Should have a downfall section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.99.176.110 (talk) 08:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Removing Trivia
Trivia section removed as it was only gossip and rumors.

No, Unreferenced fact remaining do removing unreferenced tag.

Some pictures could help to make the article better.

Mayank Abhishek 12:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Tanushree Dutta was born on March 19, 1985
Here my sources. Someone keeps vandalizing and putting her birthday at 1980 when it is indeed 1985. Why are people doing this when there are hundreds of sources online that say she was born March 19, 1985?

http://en.encyclopedia.livepress.com/index.php/Tanushree_Dutta

http://www.freshnews.in/tanushree-dutta-417

http://www.bollyone.com/tanushree-dutta-hot-n-sexy-scans

http://www.lycos.com/info/tanushree-dutta.html

http://www.mouthshut.com/review/Tanushree_Dutta-98913-1.htmlMaldek (talk) 02:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * None of the pages you've linked to are reliable. The first two are dead, the third is a copy and paste of Wiki, the third is dead (and Lycos hosts fan pages, not official sites anyway) and the last is another unreliable fansite. I'm changing it back to 1984 since Femina Miss India's profile of her 2010 has her listed as 26. Do that math (2010 - 26 = 1984). And yes, it's from 2010; Neha Dhupia is listed as 30 in the list and she was born in 1980.


 * Also, I actually think she was born in 1979 and she's lying. This biography was written when she won Femina Miss India back in 2004:


 * http://www.screenindia.com/fullcoverage/tanushree-dutta/177/


 * Now every year her birth year chances. First it was 1979, then 1980, then 1984, then 1985, then 1986 and now 1987---this Bollywood news actually claimed she turned 24 last year:


 * http://www.glamsham.com/movies/scoops/11/mar/19-tanushree-dutta-to-celebrate-birthday-with-family-031103.asp AyanP (talk) 20:23, 22 January 2012 (UTC)AyanP

Tanushree Dutta
new up comming movie is rama the saviour —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khadangasandeep (talk • contribs) 03:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Name written in Hindi script?
Could someone please write her name in Hindi in the beginning of the article and put it before the Bengali name? She is a Hindi speaker and probably uses it first. 20:25, 22 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AyanP (talk • contribs)

Reasons why the Gal Gadot entry needs to be deleted

 * There were seventy eight other contestants in the 2004 Miss Universe pageant. Surely, the others deserve a mention too, but why on Tanushree's page
 * That Gadot became famous later as Wonder Woman is still no reason for her to figure on Tanushree's page

Earlier Discussion on the subject
I don't see how information about Gal Gadot improves this article. It's at best celebrity gossip. And despite the sources' wording I seriously doubt Gadot "lost to Tanushree Dutta". Both competed in the same pageant, Gadot did worse, but unless this pageant was organized differently from any other I've ever heard of, it was not a direct competition. So Gadot "lost to" (did worse than) a bunch of people which included Dutta; she did not lose specifically to her.

At a closer look, I doubt "8th runner up", too. That seems to be based on nothing but the ordering of the top ten in our own article on the Miss Universe 2004 pageant (compare the Twitter images in the sources ), which happens to be alphabetic by country for the people from 6 to 10 and again from 11 to 15. That same "alphabetic by country" order is found in our articles on the 2005 and 2006 pageants. The statistical chance that three years in a row the places 6-10 and 11-15 were each awarded in that alphabetical order is... negligible. So we can conclude that our article likely doesn't give "6th runner up" to "15th runner up" in any order imposed by the pageant (it also doesn't cite any sources for the order of those places). Searches on Google and Google News found an "8th runner up" only in connection with the "Dutta did better than Gal Gadot" buzz, basically the above, nothing from 2004. So we seem to be engaged in circular referencing here, with the news sources falsely believing that the order of names in our own article gives the order at the pageant.

For these reasons I'll remove both the Gal Gadot stuff and the "8th runner up" again. Huon (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I am sorry for the late reply. I have a lot of real life work to do, so I am not able to concentrate much on Wikipedia these days.Gal Gadot has become famous world over after the release of Wonder Woman. It will definitely improve the article to have that information here. It is not a gossip. It is a fact as evidenced by the sources. Gadot didn't just lose to Tanushree. She lost to all the contestants who were finally placed above her and Tanushree was placed above her. When we draw a comparision between both of them, we can conclude that Gadot lost to Tanushree. I understand your point about ordering but we can safely conclude that Tanushree was definitely placed above Gadot from the sources. Tanushree was among the top 10 while Gadot wasn't. Instead of mentioning 8th runner up, we can mention that Tanushree was placed among top 10 while Gadot wasn't even among top 15.Sharkslayer87 (talk) 20:00, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

plagiarism
This was reverted because it was not sourced. But the more serious issue is that it was copied from here (literally cut and paste) https://newkok18.blogspot.com/2015/09/tanushree-dutta-image-gallery-with-Full-biography.html Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 02:51, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 October 2018
Rakhi Sawant had accuses Tanushree Dutta of raping her multiple times, twelve years ago. https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/celebrities/story/tanushree-dutta-blasts-rakhi-sawant-not-drug-addict-definitely-not-lesbian-1376309-2018-10-26 TanushreeD (talk) 18:39, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template. There are concerns of WP:UNDUE here. not everything that is printed can automatically find its way into the wikipedia article.   D Big X ray ᗙ  19:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Dispute resolution
You have been consistently redacting content from this page for varying reasons, without explaining why those reasons apply. I have reverted those edits due to them not seeming constructive to the article. At that point, you would be expected to follow the Bold-Revert-Discuss cycle, but instead you resorted to edit warring. In the process, your edit warring broke the article.

A report has been made to WP:AN/3 due to your behavior. However, I am willing to discuss here why you think the information in the article is inaccurate, in order to avoid having to have an administrator block you.

Please respond here instead of continuing your disruptive behavior.

Kirbanzo (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2018 (UTC)