Talk:Tara Downs

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --TayaCornett (talk) 04:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello,

To whom it may concern, I was recently informed as to the notification of a " speedy deletion". I was hoping to inquire as to how this article, in where the relevant curators work is hi-lighted in a similar way as to as a number of other professional profiles online is being questioned or deemed irrelevant.

The article details colleagues and contributors, participants in the same profession in a likewise manner in several other wikipedia articles referenced, and I believe that the information is of obvious relevance due to historical research purposes on behalf of my educational institution and for purposes relevant to Canadian Art History.

Please let me know !

Thank you.


 * I've added a reference from a Google News search and removed the speedy deletion tag. I'm still not sure there's enough information to write a full article, but I'll ping my colleagues and  and see if they can find anything. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  16:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've added five sources that indicate notability in the art world; revision to incorporate more information from the sources and general editing is needed, but there appears to be sustained coverage over time, at minimum due to the impact of the galleries Downs directed and helped establish. Beccaynr (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC) As an update, after revisions and adding more sources, I am further convinced as to sustained and in-depth coverage about Downs. Beccaynr (talk) 18:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'd quite like to finish cleaning up the article and cite the remaining unsourced claims (not much now), so I can nominate it as a DYK for Women's History Month Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)