Talk:Tara Teng/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article most definitely does meet the neutrality requirement of the criteria, frankly it appears to be a fansite. Kelly hi! 23:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't know Tara Teng from a Tara tree but I recommended this article be sent to re-assessment back in February as the original review was slapdash. It would be good if we can get and  back, as they already had a go at pruning a substantial amount of puffery out of the article before it was all reverted for no real reason. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  10:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It looks like I chased them away a little while back (see above). Oops... sorry... ;)(But seriously, maybe I'll have a go at cutting all the crap out.) epic genius (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * While I agree that delisting of this article is needed (way too much crap trimmed and needs re-evaluation), the GA icon is not supposed to be removed from the article DURING a reassessment. sst✈discuss 13:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I've restored the icon... for now. epic genius (talk) 22:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I've removed it. the article was 73,000 bytes when it was GAed . It has been gutted since then and is currently at 14,000 bytes; since there's no comparison between the two it cannot retain that status until re-assessed. Softlavender (talk) 11:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing as delisted. It has been removed from the relevant GA list almost two weeks ago. What a mess. sst✈discuss 05:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)