Talk:Tarbert, Harris

Whilst it might be possible to develop this article into something work keeping, in its current guise it's waste of space and I have no objection of it being merged into Harris. Ben  Mac  Dui  17:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought the merger was to be in the other direction - the Harris article's Tarbert paragraph into this one, which would appear to make sense to me. I don't think we should lose the Tarbert article as although it is a waste of space at present, while we are creating and accepting stubs for all sorts of little vilages, the main settlement of Harris is surely entitled to its own article. It definitely needs work though and I wish I knew more about it to lend a bit of a hand.MRM (talk) 19:14, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * See comment at Talk:Harris and addition to discussions at Talk:Tarbert. Ben   Mac  Dui  15:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 01:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)