Talk:Tata Group/Archive 1

Mergers & Acquisition
Can someone look over adding TATA latest aquisitions. Here's a very informative link http://inhome.rediff.com/money/2006/aug/24spec.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Me Cyrus  (talk • contribs) 06:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Citation for one of the biggest acquisition
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1548117.cms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kbi911 (talk • contribs) 09:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Illegal Acquisitions and violations of Human rights/murders
Please any of the reputed contributer please add this http://www.bhopal.net/tata_rapsheet.html This is the link that contains all the illegal activities and horrible crimes committed by TATA. As You can see the link if from the Bhopal Tragedy website that is more about Dow Chemical Company. What i noticed it that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Chemical_Company Has Human Right controversies and Environmental record. I think TATA should also have it. Whatever has been mentioned in the link can be easily verifiable from any news source especially The Orrisa and the Singuri autocracies committed by Tata. I think most of the controversies have been released in Mainstream media and are documented. We can even have a section that shows the secret documents that show how TATA tried to support DOW. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.167.226.47 (talk) 08:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Financial Information
Tatu group has a revenue of US $2651679481.92 billion?? Thats 40000 times the world economy! And no refernces have been provided about TATA group's maket cap being 98% of India's GDP. Anuragp85 —Preceding comment was added at 06:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Environmental Record
I can't figure out how to place the reference links, so I've instead used anchor links(2 of them in the second para regarding the Dhamra port). Could one of you please edit those appropriately and change it to reference links?

Traitor420 (talk) 07:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I've ref'd the first link, but the second one doesn't seem to have anything about "over 200 national and international scientists, including over 30 experts...", so it's been replaced with. If you have any reference regarding these scientists, please add it. You use tags (see WP:CITE) or Template:Citation. --Rimmington01 (talk) 06:57, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Artikel nicht mehr verfügbar
article not available anymore Fussnote 20, http://indianeconomy.org/2005/10/24/tata-corporate-social-responsibility-and-milton-friedman/=

does somebody find the article on the web? Thanks

ist nicht mehr verfügbar, findet jemand den Artikel im Web? Danke —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.227.80.204 (talk) 15:30, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Made article neutral and removed tag.
Time constrains me but some work still needs to be done. Philanthropy and Controversies section needs to be merged into the article and some info on the Radia controversy needs to be there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.87.189 (talk) 18:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Parsi or Indian?
Historically, Tata Group should be recognized as not an Indian, but a Parsi corporation. Saying that it is owned by Indians would be totally incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.203.211 (talk) 20:02, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Don't be ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.38.132 (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


 * ❌ Tata group employs people of all religions, its a corporation not a religious group. --Neelkamala (talk) 15:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Joy Scaria?
Sources? Cannot find this person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.147.160.122 (talk) 10:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Telco
7 out of 10: Telco uses also another trademark than Tata? Or 7 out of 10 of all cars made in India are Tata? Or 7 out of 10 of all cars used in India are Tata? Patrick 13:00 Dec 11, 2002 (UTC)

TELCO has been renamed as TATA motors and hence uses the same symbol T. The 7 out of ten vehicles probably means that 7 out of 10 4-wheelers in India are of TATA make. This may be commercial vehicles as well as passenger vehicles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjkblue22 (talk • contribs) 12:23, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Needs Expanding?
I believe this article needs to be expanded and cleaned up. With Tata Group being one of the biggest conglomerates, the article is quite sketchy on several details such as owenrship, history, leadership structure, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.8.242 (talk) 19:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. In addition, this article contains far too many lists. Can someone clean up & expand? (sorry I don't have the time :. --Rimmington01 (talk) 05:57, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

I need cultural values of tata Co. Galib naqvi (talk) 08:12, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

CULTURAL VALUES OF TATA
Someone explain plss Galib naqvi (talk) 08:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Copyright warning
I'd appreciate it if the editors hired by Tata to write this drivel would at least write the text in their own words. Copying text word-for-word from a copyrighted source is prohibited. If you make yourselves a pain in the ass to the Wikipedia community, we might determine to delete this article entirely. Please pretend you recognize that this is an encyclopedia, not an advertising platform. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 20:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tata Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080926022720/http://www.carnegiemedals.org/news/2007medals.html to http://www.carnegiemedals.org/news/2007medals.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/US-jury-slaps-940-million-fine-on-Tata-group-in-trade-secret-case/articleshow/51853815.cms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Sir bajaj finance card new card prosses
Sir good unning...                                                        sir i am vijay                                                        sir my subject is a new bajaj finance card Prosses. sir but my bank a/c 0000.. balance                     sir my monthly income 10000 rupies only..........  Zvijay (talk) 18:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Chairman
So I've been reverting unsourced changes lately, noticing how some IPs seem intent in changing the chairman to Nataraj Chandrasekaran from Cyrus Mistry. They don't bother to provide a different source than the one already in place, which supports the fact that Cyrus Mistry is the chairman. Any explanation as to why this is being repeatedly changed? Zera/talk 03:48, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Probably because the NCLAT order provided four weeks for the order to be challenged; which meant that the chairman remained N Chandrasekaran till such time the period elapsed or a stay was obtained. Which is the case presently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.64.4.105 (talk) 07:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Controversies and criticisms
Can we please get dates for these and order them if they’re not already? A timeline template would be ideal. Not sure how to edit. Panoone (talk) 08:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

History in India/Pakistan
Tata Industry made substantial financial contribution to the independence movement in India under British rule. Despite being a mega conglomerate and owned by a Farsi family, it is respected in India, and perhaps also in Pakistan.

Would be nice to add that bit of history by someone more knowledgeable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.23.87.19 (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Business & values POV
This section reads like a company brochure - I wouldn't be surprised if it had been lifted from some of the company's own literature. It needs to be made more neutral. mais (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * agreedVictor Grigas (talk) 14:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

I don't think it can be made more neutral without a complete rewrite - I'm going to delete it.Chiwara (talk) 19:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Still too much corporate PR.--Goldsztajn (talk) 06:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Agreed, this still sounds like corporate spin. For example, "Tata Group is a unique company; Its rigid ethic standards are so well set that most corrupt officials do not bother bribing with the Tata executives" - Is that a unique trait amongst all companies? Or is it merely stating Tata Group is unique, which could be surely said about any company? Pantherag (talk) 00:42, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * kill you 45.123.216.177 (talk) 15:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * BOMBAY HOUSE NIGHT.png