Talk:Taunton/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DharmaDreamer (talk) 12:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Reasonably well written and follows MoS, however Demography looks messy.
 * I'm not sure how to improve the appearance if the tables are to stay?&mdash; Rod talk 14:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * As far as I can see no issue with Original Research and all source provided are reliable. However this is possibly inadequatly refferenced, I have tagged the places where citations are needed so the involved parties can adress the issue.
 * References provided.&mdash; Rod talk 14:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * No problem here, provides comprehnesive coverage on all relevent aspects of taunton,For the msot part doesn't veer off topic apart from when it randomly states in the economy section "Avimo became part of Thales Optics, however their manufacturing has been transferred along with a number of staff to Glasgow and Wells." What is avimo? does it have relevance to taunton? I have never been to the town so have no idea what this is on about.
 * AVIMO explained & expanded with ref.&mdash; Rod talk 14:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No problems with NPOV as far as I can see.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Most recent edits seem minor, No major change in recent times. However there seems to have been a dispute about whether or not taunton is the biggest town in somerset, the issue seems to have settled.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Well illustrated, Images appropriatly tagged and with appropriate captions on article page.
 * 1) Pass/Fail:
 * Some minor issues to adress, very close to GA standard, mainly filling in missing citation, and sorting out demography and economyDharmaDreamer (talk) 13:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)