Talk:Tauqir Sharif

Discussion on help desk

 * Help_desk/Archives/2021_December_2

Neutrality of the article
I've checked the article and cannot find anything to suggest a lack of "Neutral Point of view". if there is no objections then I wish to submit the article for review. AmeeraFaarisa (talk) 17:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * , changing "best-known" to "Best-known" and similar edits don't really help make the article neutral or suggest it is neutral now. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I have checked the article for neutrality and can't find anything wrong with it. I've have also checked all the references and done Google searches to check that the article fairly reflects the published sources. if you have also done the same  is there any evidence you can provide for lack of neutrality. AmeeraFaarisa (talk) 20:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * There has been no further response therfeore I would like to submit the article for review. AmeeraFaarisa (talk) 19:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * , have you neutralized the tone of the article? It had a lot of COI issues by sockpuppets. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @AngusWOOF: I didn't and don't see anything serious enough to preclude mainspacing. I am happy to look at it further, but overall there seems to be a balance of statements, for example, UK government view/other views, and both positive and negative trivia, e.g.: the citizenship revocation details. The tone can perhaps be worked on more, but the inline sourcing is all there and the overall quality of the writing is reasonable. On the subject of the maintenance tags, past and present, why are there no discussions on talk about suspected sockpuppetry or paid editing? Iskandar323 (talk) 17:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , see the article history and the help desk note above. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Whatever the page's origins, it has now been tempered by several editors, including yourself, and the sourcing and notability are hardly in dispute. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * ,, do you have any concerns about this version of the article? AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi. I don't have any opinion regarding pov.  My concern was simply the UPE issue, which now seems to be remedied.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)