Talk:Taurus–Littrow/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Bobby122   Contact Me   (C)  04:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Will review this article pretty soon.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I have failed the article in this category as the dating in the references differ, there are two styles used.. Also, check that there is a  between units and measurements as I see a few units and measurements without one. Also the values in the article must be converted eg. metric to imperial or vice versa. If possible use the convert template, 8 km . You can also ad abbr=on to abbreviate the units, note that units should be spelled out the first time they are used. Also I fixed some prose issues. Issues fixed, pass.
 * Unit conversions - ✅
 * Fix ref retrieval dates - ✅
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The citations are reliable and each cite provided at the end of the paragraph supports everything withing that paragraph.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Covers everything that can be covered about a lunar valley and is focused on the valley and important people who were once there (Apollo 17).
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congrats, passed.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congrats, passed.