Talk:Taylor Lautner/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: demize  (t · c) 22:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Initial impressions
Well formatted, well source in most cases, although the list of TV shows and films he has appeared in is sourced solely to Yahoo! Movies. As well, the article seems stable, but upon investigation of the Protection log it appears this is because it is indefinitely semi-protected. demize (t · c) 23:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * I fixed that statement, and most of the focus in the PL section on Swift is due to Lautner being the subject of her song, "Back to December" and the coverage behind that. If you still think some needs to be removed, do you have any specifics? Candy  o32  - Happy New Year :) 15:51, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I see the purpose behind it, and I don't see much of a problem with it, so it's fine. demize  (t · c) 17:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I see the purpose behind it, and I don't see much of a problem with it, so it's fine. demize  (t · c) 17:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC)


 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Ooops, I used the wrong source of the number one ranking. Could you explain what you mean by ref 36. And I'll search for another filmography link. Candy  o32  - Happy New Year :) 15:51, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Reference 36 talks about nominations for awards rather than winning awards, but some statements about awards being won are sourced to ref 36. Also, ref 36 has now become ref 37, so here's a convenience link: . It appears that there's only one point sourced to it in the table though, so another source should not be hard to find. demize  (t · c) 17:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Candy o32  - Happy New Year :) 22:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Ooops, I used the wrong source of the number one ranking. Could you explain what you mean by ref 36. And I'll search for another filmography link. Candy  o32  - Happy New Year :) 15:51, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Reference 36 talks about nominations for awards rather than winning awards, but some statements about awards being won are sourced to ref 36. Also, ref 36 has now become ref 37, so here's a convenience link: . It appears that there's only one point sourced to it in the table though, so another source should not be hard to find. demize  (t · c) 17:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Candy o32  - Happy New Year :) 22:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Issues mentioned above fixed. I removed the statement about Lautner being the number one in his category, as I could not find any reliable sources for it. As such, the article passes. Good job. demize  (t · c) 23:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Issues mentioned above fixed. I removed the statement about Lautner being the number one in his category, as I could not find any reliable sources for it. As such, the article passes. Good job. demize  (t · c) 23:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Issues mentioned above fixed. I removed the statement about Lautner being the number one in his category, as I could not find any reliable sources for it. As such, the article passes. Good job. demize  (t · c) 23:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Issues mentioned above fixed. I removed the statement about Lautner being the number one in his category, as I could not find any reliable sources for it. As such, the article passes. Good job. demize  (t · c) 23:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)