Talk:Taylor Swift–Ticketmaster controversy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 07:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I will take this on. Due to the size, it might take me a little while and multiple rounds so please bear with me.  The C of E God Save the King!  ( talk ) 07:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * As per WP:MOSLEADCITE, there should be no citations in the lede.
 * But, as it also says "all quotations must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports it."  ℛonherry  ☘  16:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)


 * "Numerous fans and consumer groups alleged that Ticketmaster is deceitful", is or were?
 * I agree that it should be past tense, but shouldn't it be "was" instead of "were"? Ticketmaster has been referred to as a singular entity throughout the articles, just like in the sources.  ℛonherry  ☘  16:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC)


 * As per MOS:ACRO1STUSE, the United Kingdom should be spelt out first and then UK/British afterwards (not U.K.)
 * "Ticketmaster was a subject", "a subject" or "the subject"?
 * "both Ticketmaster and Live Nation received backlash and media attention", from whom?
 * In the Taylor Swift section, scalpers shouldn't be linked as it was already linked in the earlier Company section.
 * "either completely logged out or in a queue 2,000-plus people strong that appeared frozen.", who said that? Also per MOS:PF, the punctuation should be at the end.
 * "trust an outside entity with these relationships and loyalties", inline cite needed
 * More to come.  The C of E God Save the King!  ( talk ) 17:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Why are the lawsuit sections in bullet points? As per WP:BULLET, it says "They are not appropriate for large paragraphs"
 * Same for political sections
 * What is "Tickets today" and why is there no other mention of it in the article? As would be expected for a section header
 * It's a secondary platform that Ticketmaster used to sell the remaining tickets before the website crashed. It was their solution to the crisis, apparently.  ℛonherry  ☘  16:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)


 * What area does AOC represent in the House?
 * Same for Pascrel and all other House reps and Senators
 * I've mentioned Pascrel and AOC's districts now. For those who hold bigger offices, like the chair of a committee, I think their biggest designation is enough, like in Klobuchar's case?  ℛonherry  ☘  17:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Should be "United States Attorney General" in full
 * Need an inline citation for the "Grilled" line or it comes across as WP:POV
 * Federal and State legislature sections, BULLET again.
 * same for Further Controversy
 * Note 3 needs a citation for the list of politicians.
 * More to come. I Will try to review the references tomorrow.  The C of E God Save the King!  ( talk ) 07:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ all, except those that've raised some questions about.  ℛonherry  ☘  17:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay, real life stuff got in the way. I was pleasantly surprised after reviewing the sources, that I could find no issues with those and I accept the explanations for the above. So even though I know little about Swift nor know any of her songs, I think this is very well written and I am happy to approve it for GA status. Well done.  The C of E God Save the King!  ( talk ) 08:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much!  ℛonherry  ☘  10:20, 7 March 2024 (UTC)