Talk:Tea Peter/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 15:11, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't feel this is ready to be listed as a Good Article, based purely on prose and not being broad in its coverage. While prose is sufficient in some parts, there are many contentious sentences and statements, some being:


 * "It was viewed by 4.94 U.S. viewers", does not make sense. Firstly the reader should be aware the Nielsen ratings apply to United States viewers and the measurement is not clear: 4.94 hundred people, million people, bananas? ✅
 * "on the same night with Desperate Housewives and Celebrity Apprentice" on the same network, or same time on different networks? ✅
 * reopening is fine without a hyphen ✅
 * "however praising on the "cutaways which made", 'on' is not needed ✅
 * One cultural reference in Family Guy? The obvious being the Tea Party, perhaps you can include there why Peter joined in the first place. ✅

The article on the whole is too short, there are WP:WEIGHT issues: Reception gets almost twice the coverage of Production and cultural references. Guest stars in the latter heading have been overlinked – already wiklinked in the lead. ✅ I suggest you address the comments above, perhaps take this to Peer Review ✅ to iron out certain issues and then feel free to renominate. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)