Talk:Teacher in role

Research
I wrote the article as it stands, and i agree it needs work. If anyone is intrested in helping I suggest reading articles by dorothy heathcote & jonothan neelands. I would try, but as it has been mentioned I seem to be writing an academic essay, not an encyclopedic entry. --Arlechinio 04:14, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Wikified
My first attempt at wikifying, or any real editing. Hope I didn't botch it. Regards, Anonymous.

You did fine. I went through, added a few more wikifications, then removed the Wikify template. I don't believe that there is any more need for a notice, as most applicable links are wikified now. Cabhan 00:20, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

cleanup
I put the cleanup tag on this article because I don't understand it enough to rewrite it; I can't figure out what it's trying to say. What the heck does "teacher in role" even mean??? (I would have AFD'd it except for the above vote). - DavidWBrooks 20:23, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

maybe should be moved
maybe this should be moved as a sub-section in a drama in education entry, as it is only a method of teaching and not an actual concept in itself. I've tried to re-write it but as a concept its hard to explain without knowing why it's being used. I know i don't make much sense but it is an important thing just not explained to well. sorry --Arlechinio 23:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

major pruning
I am going to remove the entire example section. I would have sent it to AfD but that has been done and my Google search does show notability. I will post a note to the Drama Education project and ask someone to make some sense of the rest.--killing sparrows 05:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Merging
I am not totally sure, but isn't this article about the same as teaching in-Role? only that this article is talking about the one doing the action, and the other article about the action. Snuitkever (talk) 14:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Importance Section
Stumbled across this article trying to find out about Dorothy Heathcote and wow, the 'Importance' section is full of opinions. I can't see how that section relates to the topic either.

Kissycat (talk) 15:33, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

More wikifying?
Stumbled across this article. It has enough notability but I'm going to try to just make it a bit more encyclopaedic in format without cutting any of the information. ƒin (talk) 06:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Update: kinda lied - read it more thoroughly and did some cutting. I think the article is far more relevant to the theory. I felt bad because the original was pretty well written so I've attempted to do as little rewriting as possible and kept in most of the original language the version of the article before my changes is here. If someone is mad please yell at me on my talk page.