Talk:TeamFourStar

Notability of TeamFourStar + Notes
TeamFourStar is notable because they meet the general notability guidelines along with the guidelines for web-based content. Their Dragon Ball Z parody videos have received significant coverage from multiple independent, reliable outlets such as Kotaku, Polygon, Comicbook and CBR, and have received praise from those outlets as well due to its faithfulness to the original Dragon Ball Z franchise. I was actually surprised that there wasn’t a Wikipedia article on them yet, seeing as how they’re one of the biggest anime channels and have been YouTube pioneers since 2008. Not only that, but their Abridged series has its own long branch in the redwood tree that is the legacy of Dragon Ball Z. I would like to add a section to the Dragon Ball page denoting their legacy if this draft were to get accepted.

As for the sources, only two of them might raise concerns in reliability: Dexerto and Screen Rant. For the former, I only used the source once as backed up with reliable outlet Polygon, although I’m unsure why it’s considered unreliable besides it being “clickbait” - at the very least it should be considered situationally reliable, but that’s a conversation on WP:RS/VG for another day. The latter source is listed as a situationally reliable source for entertainment and pop culture topics, which the subject of the article classifies as. The rest should all be considered reliable and significantly cover the channel and their Dragon Ball Z Abridged series. There shouldn’t be any problems with the article, but if there is, message me here on the talk page before declining or accepting the draft. I assume it’s quite unorthodox, but I would appreciate it.

Thanks! PantheonRadiance (talk) 04:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Buu Bits are not notable
I think the Buu Bits section should be removed. Not a single news piece or article from any notable source like Kotaku, CBR, Dextero, ComicBook.com, etc. reported on it. And mind you, all of those sites covered TFS in the past.

The only source for it currently in the article is TeamFourStar themselves. The latter half of the section also has no source at all. It's basically original research from a fan's point of view, rather than a neutral point of view. 174.87.117.106 (talk) 04:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I apologize for the late reply, and I'm not even sure if the OP will ever see this, but thank you for bringing attention to this. I was going to remove that info a while back but kept procrastinating on the off chance a source may cover it, then forgot about it until today. PantheonRadiance (talk) 07:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC)