Talk:Team Unicorn

}}

Keep rationale
It is my contention that this work meets the criteria for musicians and ensembles based on criteria 1 and 7:
 * #1: The work has been covered in a variety of media and as been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable.
 * #7: Is a prominent representation of a notable style (geek rock).  More importantly it is one of the first geek “girl group” productions to see wide release, making it a seminal work of an emerging style. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NorthernDragon (talk • contribs) 13:30, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

New video by them
It's probably not particularly notable - which is why I didn't edit it into the article - but they made a new video: A Very Zombie Holiday. --V2Blast (talk) 17:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Team Unicorn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100930031059/http://www.fox5sandiego.com:80/videobeta/95c0a11e-e1b9-4f3b-a2cf-c2b5eb23bf94/Community/Meet-the-Geek-Girls? to http://www.fox5sandiego.com/videobeta/95c0a11e-e1b9-4f3b-a2cf-c2b5eb23bf94/Community/Meet-the-Geek-Girls
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110301100928/http://www.smodcast.com:80/baggedandboarded/bb/bb83.html to http://smodcast.com/baggedandboarded/bb/bb83.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Infobox image
The image to the right was added to the infobox on July 26, 2015, then removed on August 5, 2015 with the comment: Since Michele Boyd has not been a part of the group for several years, this does not accurately portray the group. I think it should be put in the infobox, since: Less importantly: I gather disagrees. Let's talk, and see if we can come to agreement, or whether anyone else has any other opinions. --GRuban (talk) 18:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * it does portray the group at founding, which is not any less important than at current
 * they got their notability with their starting line-up, not with the current one.
 * it does portray 3 of the 4 current members; and
 * we don't have any freely licensed image of the group at current (I looked, which is why there is another image of the group later in the article - again at founding, not at current lineup).


 * Since there isn't a current picture, it's better than nothing, and the caption already indicates it's an old lineup. It can be updated to a picture of the new lineup should such a picture come up in Commons. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)


 * tried to post another picture of the group using this one but it looks to be a duplicate of the one at comingsoon.net . It's also the one they have been using as their icon on Twitter. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)