Talk:Team effectiveness/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 20:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

I will review this article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Stability review

 * 1) Article mainspace = Upon inspection of article mainspace, edit history shows no signs of conflict going back several months.
 * 2) Talk page = Looking at talk page and talk page history shows stability.

Article is stable.

Next, on to image review. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:45, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Image review
Licensing checks out okay on all images. All images hosted on Wikimedia Commons. However the formatting in the article is a bit odd. Please remove the italics from the captions. Please format all images with "thumb" in the parameters to default to ideal image size. Suggest adding year of picture in parentheses after caption descriptive text. Optional if you wish, to read Alternative text for images and add ALT Text to images as well. Please update here when above is done. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:57, 11 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I have made the respective changes to the article


 * p.s. Thank you for reviewing my article


 * Xyzbb1253 (talk) 06:54, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * , most of the cites in the article appear to be nicely formatted with Citation templates, but can you format number 12, Hackman? And go through and make sure all others are formatted the same way? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I have made adjustments to the references -- Xyzbb1253 (talk) 10:50, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

, you shouldn't need citations in the lede intro sect at all, per WP:LEAD the lede intro sect should function as a standalone summary of the entire article's contents, and should only summarize stuff cited later in the body of the article itself. Cites are only needed in lede for direct quotes and/or material that is contentious or likely to be challenged. Can you fix that? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 17:35, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I have reduced the amount of citations in the intro but left some important one's because the topic of team effectiveness is a very common topic in the fields of I/O Psychology, Organizational Behavior & Organization Development, even though the article is stable, it very likely that without sources the article will be challenged. --Xyzbb1253 (talk) 01:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, sounds good. Should finish up the rest of the review soon. I'll let you know if there's anything else I can think of that would help improve it further. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)