Talk:Teamwork (project management)

Company or software?
It is not clear to me whether this page is about the software or the company that makes the software. If it's about the software, as is indicated by the links and templates, then the first paragraph should be rewritten to reflect this.U2fanboi (talk) 11:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...

I feel it is very unfair to delete this page, everything on it is factually correct and I have provided credible citations and references from large 3rd party websites including some very credible and long standing newspaper companies. I have also been very careful with this submission, everything in the simple listing is 100% truth and I have carefully ensured that it does not contain anything that could be consider advertising.

Unfair No fewer than 161 of our competitors have detailed pages on wikipedia listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_project_management_software. And many of our these have pages which are blatant advertising; We on the other hand can't even get a simple, factually correct, tiny page up. In this, I feel that Wikipedia editors have been very unfair to Teamwork.com to date.

I am happy to make any corrections you deem are needed but please, for the love of fairness, give us a fair chance.

Yours Earnestly, Peter Coppinger


 * I have declined the speedy deletion due to the sources. However, other companies having pages is irrelevant.  You should also not be writing about your own company given your conflict of interest. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:39, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

COI
Editors with a connection to this subject (including members of the Teamwork marketing team (whether SEO or partner marketing), engineering team or other employees of Teamwork) need to please read the WP:COI guidelines. And consider declaring any related conflict-of-interest. And/or, frankly, avoiding the temptation to edit this article entirely. Any editor (including one with a declared or undeclared COI) can correct obvious errors in an article. If uncontroversial and supported by reliable/non-primary references. And an explanation in a relevant edit summary. Other types of changes however, including updated product descriptions, market positioning and other stuff that could be considered advertising, should be raised here. On the talk page. As a requested/proposed edit. Escalation next. Guliolopez (talk) 12:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Misleading title
I came here to read about "Teamwork" in the context of "project management" like the title says: "Teamwork (project management)". This article is not about that. Tehdastehdastehdas (talk) 13:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)