Talk:Teavana

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Captainyackie.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:FOOD Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:20, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Recent changes
I need to remember not to take this off my watchlist. I cleaned up the article and removed the following: anything POV, a long unsourced statement, repetitive information, outdated information (just because it didn't have competition in 2005 doesn't mean that is still the case five years later), a statement that made me go "well, duh!" (that rock sugar is used to sweeten things...man, I was totally going to use it to make my nacho cheese spicier), the link to the app as promotional, and all weasel and peacock terms. This article is used to convey information about the company, not promote it. --132 18:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't understand why a commercial article like this belongs in Wikipedia. Thank you for cleaning it up, but this is just promotional material IMHO. Aratinga77 (talk) 00:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Consumerist Article Link
It no longer works. Moreover, I cannot find the article via their website search. Additionally, there is no reference to this article on archive.org that I could find. Does anyone have a mirror link? OmnipotentEntity (talk) 02:49, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The link works fine for me, but why is this even in the article? If what it says at the moment is correct then even the author of the source doesn't feel it is significant "I do feel that my story should be taken with a grain of salt" . This is about as perfect example of WP:UNDUE as you can get. It's not really any different to us sourcing a blog post. If the person who added the added the long note about why it can't be removed is watching this page, please explain why you think this sourcing is suitable. SmartSE (talk) 11:56, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, and the crap about the charity should also be removed too - we need to use good sources, rather than one crap negative one and several crap positive ones. This isn't the way to achieve a NPOV. SmartSE (talk) 11:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

The link does not work
Dear Wiki editors,

The link in the references section "Starbucks Buys Teavana". Huffington Post. 2012-11-15 does not work. If possible, please replace it with another source. Thank you!--Asopeltseva (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Giving Back Section
It seems like the partnership with Starbucks is overlooked, and should mention how Teavana is also a part of their programs. Also, Teavana partners with other organizations that Starbucks does not mention, so it seems important to highlight them. If anyone has other organizations they may have partnered with in the past, or times Teavana has donated to anything please add. Captainyackie (talk) 22:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)