Talk:Technoculture

Untitled
I note that the term has 3890 hits in Google Books. That's a very large number for Google Books and indicates that the term has gotten significant traction in academia. There are considerably more than the two universities cited that use the term in reference to study areas or degree programs. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:11, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Technoculture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060217084240/http://www.georgetown.edu/faculty/irvinem/technoculture/technoculture.html to http://www.georgetown.edu/faculty/irvinem/technoculture/technoculture.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism?
I've deleted the photo of Bob Ostertag as he appears to be part of the Cinema and Digital Media dept of UC Davies, rather than a department relevant to this article which concerns the term as used to describe the impact of technology on society rather than on the arts. The term "notable" used in the photo to decribe him is also peacocking in the absence of any subtantiation. Substantiation of the claim is also missing on the wiki article on him (which has been flagged with multiple issues). I have also added a reference to a review of the book on the subject by Penley and Rose that the article refers to. LookingGlass (talk) 12:38, 17 August 2016 (UTC)