Talk:Ted Hill (mathematician)

The recent edits
It is certainly interesting what happened. Unfortunately I'm not sure if we can get a balanced view here. We know Ted Hill's side of the story, but the other side pretends nothing happened - and, if we can trust the article that was linked, puts a lot of effort into making sure nothing is made public about it. --mfb (talk) 08:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Was discussed in Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard. --mfb (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)


 * I should distribute trouts to various over-eager reverters here. While the content introduced by was indeed problematic, they also explicitly pointed out in the edit summary that the article in The Scientist had been corrected, including its title - and that was also reverted, re-introducing statements that The Scientist no longer supports. I've fixed that and tried to better summarize the main points of controversy that The Scientist highlights. Huon (talk) 02:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)