Talk:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 05:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I will be preforming this review. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Immediate failure
1. Its pretty close to all of the criteria 2. |a Earwig flags various issues which I will take a look at the highest being a 93.5% overlap. I'll take a further look though
 * Okay of the seven sources with over 40% overlap 5 of the 6 are quotes. Another thing is the title gets flagged as plagerism which I think is kind of funny. The highest one seems to be lifting from Wikipedia. Crisis averted the reveiw may continue!

3. No maintenance tags. 4. Page is currently stable, no persistent vandalism. 5. No previous nominations ✅

Well-written

 * Any particular reason why Jimmy Donaldson/MrBeast is listed as MrBeast and not Jimmy Donaldson? I understand that the articles name is MrBeast as it is the common name is that the reason here?
 * The voice cast section is based on the end credits crawl. He is referred to as MrBeast in the end credits. Post Malone, for example, is referred to as Austin Post in the credits despite his pseudonym being better known, and the name of his article.


 * At the end of "Themes" before the quote a period is used instead of a comma when it should be the other way around
 * Fixed it!

✅ ✅

Verifiable

 * I have randomly selected sources 8, 75 and 102 for a spot check. (based on this revision )

REF 8
Claim: Kyler Spears joined the film as co-director, signing on because he had worked with Rowe on his prior film, The Mitchells vs. the Machines (2021). Source: |a Cinesite Tapped for ‘Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem’, Title Revealed

Proven by source: No the source does confirm Rowe worked on Mitchel vs. the Machines and that Spears worked on Mutant Mayhem. It was paried with a second source which does confirm that the link between the two was the Mitchels v. the Machines

REF 75
Claim: Audiences surveyed by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "A" on an A+ to F scale, while those polled at PostTrak gave it an 88% overall positive score, with 70% saying they would definitely recommend the film. Source: 

Proven by source:
 * There is a section dedicated to the film where the information is confirmed.

REF 102
Claim: The film was nominated for a still pending (as of 7 January 2024 winners have not yet been announced so it is listed as pending) for a critics choice award. Source: 

Proven by source:
 * Under the subheader "best animated feature" it is listed.

Backed up by other sources: Which is an offical website states the fact as well.


 * What is the reliablity of Nerd Reactor? From what I looked at their website doesnt have an about page and I havent found anything atesting to their reliability. So is it good? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:46, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I was able to find this discussion from 2020 and this one from 2021. I think in the context I used it, it is fine? But maybe it will be safer looking for a substitute. Zingo156 (talk) 19:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

✅

Broad in coverage

 * The plot section is 579 words, 121 under/over the 700 word limit.


 * Article stays on topic with links where applicable.

✅

Neutral
Nothing overly praises it nor criticizes it. Good mix of postive and negative reviews in "Critical Reception"

✅

Stable
The last reverted edit was on the 25 of December 2023. Its been pretty stable since then it also has a Protection Template. No major debates in the past three months. ✅

Illustrated
The article has five images two of which are free use. The three from commons are of the producers and the director which I understand. ✅
 * 1) Movie poster (free use): Understandble to show
 * 2) Concept art (free use): I understand the use of this under desing to held explain the characters better.