Talk:Teeth (Lady Gaga song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: FrB.TG (talk · contribs) 13:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

I am impressed with the amount of content given that it's a non-single song. --  Frankie talk 13:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I look forward to your review and addressing any concerns you may have. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Lead
 * Looks fine but I think you should include the overall reaction from commentators. If possible, try to add what the song is about, lyrically or analytically (though I doubt the latter is available for an article this short).
 * I added that the song received a mixed reception from critics. I don't think we need to mention the various song descriptors or oral theme in the lead, especially since this is short a short article and these are mentioned in the first paragraph, immediately below the lead. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The lead is supposed to summarize the whole article. I don't think this should be an exception.
 * Better? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Infobox
 * Genre not known?
 * The article has descriptive words like "dancey", "gospel ode", "part country", "a little tribal", etc., but I added "Pop" to be more general. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Most of the time I see that articles tend to write the real names of writers which is Stefani Germanotta for Gaga. But I am sure you have something to defend it.
 * Just following the same convention used at the parent (album) article: The Fame Monster. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Composition
 * I don't think you need to abbreviate sadomasochism as I don't see any subsequent use of it.
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Music Times needs to be wiki-linked in fifth line.
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * "authorship, and ownership [of 'Teeth'] are all false and untrue" - I am not sure why is Teeth in single quotes when Wikipedia uses ".
 * Quote within a quote means we use punctuation in this way, as far as I know and have seen. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Whoops, my bad! I myself write it this way but it slipped out of my mind. --  Frankie talk 07:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No prob! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Reception
 * There are some reviews from some not-so-well-known sites. I wonder if it's okay for GA standard; personally it's okay for me as they are just reviews.
 * Any explanations on this?


 * Vulture, I believe is a news entertainment published under New York magazine so it needs to be in italics.
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * References
 * Remove Postmedia Network from ref 9 to maintain consistency.
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

That's all I have got to say for this short but nice article. --  Frankie talk 23:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your time and assistance! Please let me know if any concerns still need to be addressed. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:46, 3 March 2016 (UTC)