Talk:Tehran Stock Exchange/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Epistemophiliac (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Comment
Two redlinks, one external link in here.  Perseus  ( t  •  c )  17:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer:
 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Great article but three things I think need to updated before it deserves to go from on-hold to approved: Epistemophiliac (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Not a huge problem yet, but the article uses "in recent years" fairly frequently yet data references to 2008 and before - while fine for now, for future proofing may be wise to use "in the years 2002 through 2008..." instead
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Missing a reference in the "Mutual Funds" section
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Self created pictures are nice, personally hard to verify data (I can't read Farsi), but would be great if data in them can be improved (ie:USD-IRR_exchange_rate.JPG) shows data only till 2008 - when you should be able to get more recent data.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Very very close, I'm almost tempted to Be Bold with it
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Very very close, I'm almost tempted to Be Bold with it

Concerns seem to be addressed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 14:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) I agree, I think it's a good article now  Epistemophiliac (talk) 03:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)