Talk:Tekken/Archive 1

Tekken Bowl for iOS and Tekken Card Tournament for iOS
I think we have to include these games in these pages, they are available for iOS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.10.121.16 (talk) 17:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Law included in all installments of Tekken
Wasn't Law also included in all eight installments of Tekken? According to: http://tekken.wikia.com/wiki/Marshall_Law, Law is there unless it's Forest Law, but their moves are pretty much the same. Ituhubert (talk) 23:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Jimmy Wales cross-edit confusion, what?
What happened to this page? Perhaps a good lesson in being sure which window you're editing... I find the visual image of Jimmy Wales playing Tekken while creating Wikipedia to be hilarious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.30.94.4 (talk) 19:01, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Untitled
perhaps a disambiguation page seperating the videogame from the weapon (http://www.martialarts.com/martial-arts-articles/ninja_weapons.htm) is in order

Tekken 7?
Can I ask where all this information about which characters will and wont be in Tekken 7 has come from? Please someone let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CallumJun (talk • contribs) 21:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

I have no idea what you are talking about I see nothing on Tekken 7. Also people please quit changing the Arcade release date of Tekken 6 and Tekken 6:BR... Tekken 6 was released in Arcades in 2007 and BR was released in 2008. The console version is released in 2009, but article says Arcade releases not console, so please quit changing it. --Notacka (talk) 08:38, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Separated
I've separated the Tekken series from the first game. For the series, go here: Tekken (Series) and for the game, go here: Tekken (Video game) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tud123 (talk • contribs) 17:33, November 30, 2006 (UTC)
 * Can someone plase add more details to the article for the game please. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.142.145.214 (talk • contribs) 06:01, December 1, 2006 (UTC)
 * This move has been cleaned up some; the series article is now back at Tekken and the first game is at Tekken (video game). If that's not correct (for instance if you'd prefer it at Tekken 1) feel free to bring that up at the game's talk page. -- nae'blis 20:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Please leave it as it was with the word series in brackets, it may confuse some people. I've edited it back. Leave it! - Tud123
 * We can move the page to a parenthetical name if needed, but please do not copy-and-paste information to do so. You're running the risk of losing page history that way, something we need for compliance with the GFDL. Please see Moving a page for some of the reasons why this is a bad idea. A discussion can be opened on moving the page to an alternate location, but there's no need to be hasty. Would Tekken series be better for the overall article? -- nae'blis 02:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

This is the overall article, isn't it? Oh and can you leave the Tekken Template how it is currently - Tud123
 * Yep, this is the overall article. The first game could live at the title Tekken (since that's what it's called, not Tekken 1, I don't think), or we could add the word series after Tekken for the overall article (either in parentheses or not). Would you like me to open a formal Requested Move process to determine where most people want them to be? -- nae'blis 09:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

OK? - Tud123

Rehauling the Character Pages
I run the wiki http://www.tekkenpedia.com, if you visit that you can see how I've laid out my character pages, if it saves time then feel free to use my layout / content and media on wikipedia.

An example character page: http://www.tekkenpedia.com/wiki/Anna_Williams


 * And exactly how are these pages better than Wikipedias? King Zeal 19:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I never said they were better, I said they were available for use if needed. 210.10.116.166 22:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I think Zeal meant to say "Thank you" 198.6.46.11 18:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Nonetheless, they have since erased character pages, other than Nina Williams and Yoshimitsu.Sallyboy44 (talk) 01:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

TekkenFan
Is there anyone who thinks the TekkenFan links should even be kept on the Tekken sites? First of all they've been spammed all over the place, not for good Tekken content, but for having match videos. Second of all, I finally went to the website myself and cannot find any content on this one site that all the other sites already listed don't have. The only real Tekken information it contains is about Tekken 5, and we already have the official website listed for that info. In my opinion the TekkenFan links should just be removed. I'll leave this open to discussion before I make any more changes. --TheKoG 02:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Also see number 2 of External links --TheKoG 02:09, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Take them off, indeed. Delete blatent spam. -MegamanZero|Talk 03:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Since there are a few users still spamming the TekkenFan links I have PMed the admin of the site in hopes to get this matter settled. --TheKoG 02:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Admin from TekkenFan.com
Sorry if this is the wrong format, I am not too sure on what the syntax is here. This site is a personal site, but is in no way commercial. I pull maybe a quarter per month from banners, and if that ever gets to the 20 per month i pay for hosting, it will go towards the hosting.

So if you wanna call it anything it would be non-profit? Wanna talk about a commericial site? TekkenZaibatsu even gets donations to fill its pockets with the thousands of people that go there. The reason a majority of the content is tekken 5 is becuase the site has only been opened for 6 months. And those staple juggles(no other site has) and moves list for each character.

I restrict 95% of the site's content from guests(and add banners to guests) for an incentive to signup. The whole thing is free, and signup doesn't take more than 2 minutes. It doesn't even validate the email addres.

I actually dont see how you can say there is no content. . .I have spent SOOOOO much time adding content to that site.

You have the offical site listed? Namco doesn't put ANYthing on that site(except for news and new pictures), but no one in any Tekken community goes to that 'official' site.

I do concentrate on Tekken Videos because that is what the people want. I have cheap bandwidth, and want to spread as many tekken videos(none i made) to as many people wanting them as possible.

In the end, I'm a 23 year old kid, who can't afford the hundreds of dollars to advertise, and saw a good referral/signup rate from Wikipedia. I dunno who 'added the site to everything with 'tekken' in it', but all I have done is add TekkenFan.com to the list of external links under the 'tekken' page.

I apologize for any misunderstanding myself or any member of my site has caused, and hope you will add the link back to the external links list.


 * The problem isn't whether a link is commercial or personal. The list of external links section is for added information outside of what the official site offers.  See What_wikipedia_is_not. The Wikipedia is not for advertising.  The reason the other links are already there is because they have been chosen for the information they contain, not because someone wants to advertise.  Frankly, TekkenFan does not seem to add anything that the other links do not already provide.  The external links section is already bloated and sometime soon, when I have enough time to carefully review the rest of the sites listed, I will attempt to trim it down.  Another thing, restricting 95% of content from guests is a sure-fire way of not getting listed on the Wikipedia.  It does not matter if the registration is free or not.  TekkenZaibatsu may very well be a commercial site, but it contains a wealth of information about the Tekken series without requiring registration.  The reason you also saw a good referral/signup rate is because you cannot do anything without registering.  For example, in order to contact you I had to sign up.  There was no other way around it.  Therefore, I am now listed as another one of your users with another referral/signup.  In my opinion it's a dirty tactic to inflate your site's numbers.  I am not a member of TekkenZaibatsu, yet now I am a member of TekkenFan.  --TheKoG 06:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

And again
The reason I made TekkenFan was to compete against TekkenZaibatsu. I am VERY anti-banners when it comes to visiting sites over and over(why fill my laptop with spyware, adware, and cookies). Also because of all the banners, it loads SUPER SLOW. I made TekkenFan because when you the people(signups, members, whatever) come to the site, besides what original(yea original) content I put on there, they MAKE the site. Why must I require them to pay me to remove banners, give access to videos, and everything they hide from non-paying members. It's sad, people already must pay 50 dollars for the game, why not have a free site that offers some competition. You also said you couldn't contact me without signing up. Incorrect, at the top of every page is 'contact us'. Viewable to both members, and guests. It was one of the first php scripts/plugins I made for the site. Like I said, I've worked for months adding content on the site, comparing other sites, and offering things no other sites do. I am tired of debating this. Do what you want, but a definate good way to turn people off from wikipedia. Be sure to keep that tekkenpedia link in there as well(sooo much content that others just dont have). Like I said, do what you want. I've stated my case.
 * There is no case. You can work for months on end regarding your site, and I appalaud that. But keep it out of encyclopediac articles. It is spam, and will be removed on sight. Please honor this request, and desist adding your links to wikipedian articles regading your site. Thank you. -ZeroTalk 22:51, 22 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I also had TekkenFan come onto my wiki and add his link to the front page of the Tekkenpedia instead of the community portal, citing that "it is a Wiki and I'm allowed to do that". 58.104.44.152 06:54, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


 * About adverts (And some history to make it educational)
 * Actually match video's are not everything, it's community. Many sites in the past have come out offering video's and closed down months later due to high bandwidth costs. Lets face it people want things for nothing, and are willing to get everything they can, this results in a lot of media transfer from people who don't care about the site they are getting it from. For a long time it was only TZ, AP and TC that were doing any form of large scale media production, with sites like EC having their moment in the spotlight then unfortunately dying. I realised that movies weren't everything, and were only fueling the fire that was my bandwidth cost and tried off loading them through Bittorrent and soon after TZ started doing it as well, but people still complained. I've had the media off the site for a while now but the next few weeks will see it _all_ coming back.


 * I worked for an internet advertising company dealing with banner deployment and other advertising like Google's AdSense, and lots of websites get it all wrong. One or sometimes two well placed adverts will do really well, where splashing them everywhere usually detracts from the site. This could be a case of members just doing the wrong thing and the admin copping all the blame, happens all the time, but it's still the admin's responsibility to keep their members inline. Your suggestion to stick the links in their signatures was a great suggestion, just someone took it a little too far. Also TZ has not only bandwidth to pay for but hardware maintenance, it's because of this maintenance that AP was created (TZ went down for 4 days back in 2001 while we were organising our first Brisbane tournament and we needed somewhere to keep organising).


 * When you have 1k+ (AP was at about 900$/m) bandwidth bills per month, that's when you will know how much that few dollars here and there from sponsors helps, it's not a get rich quick scheme, it's the fact that you are offering something for free and getting charged for it by your providers. Nothing in this world is free, didn't Wikipedia just have a fund raising effort?


 * Anyhow, thought I'd add my 2c since I was looking.
 * Scott.Moss 06:48, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

The Namco fighting universe
I keep wondering if by any chance, Soul Calibur and Tekken take place on different time periods of the same planet Earth on the same universe?


 * No official confrimation yet, but its generally believed they do take place in the same continuity. -ZeroTalk 09:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * In fact Yoshimitsu from Tekken is the leader of the Manji clan, while Yoshimitsu from Soul Calibur is the founder of that clan. Plus Heihachi in the PS2 version of Soul Calibur II comes from the future and not another universe.--82.89.160.110 (talk) 17:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Unless Namco says something official, it's speculation drawn from vague story tidbits. King Zeal (talk) 21:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Tekken Series banner
Is there any way to edit the Tekken series banner at the bottom of the page? Tekken Tag Tournament is under the heading - Main Games when it should be in the same place as Tekken 5: Dark Resurrection as it was just an update to Tekken 3. It is not part of the series or Tekken 4 would have been the 5th game. The Main Games header should only include Tekken 1,2,3,4 and 5.

The Devil Gene, G-Corporation, The Mishima Zaibatsu and The Mishima Polytechnical School should be in it. - The 4th Snake

Relese dates
I added more accurate release dates for all Tekken games. I used http://tekkenzaibatsu.com/ and http://www.gamespot.com/ as sources. They are still incomplete so please add more accurate release dates if you know them. --80.186.158.146 16:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Tekken movie
I don't see any mention of it here at all...--Marhawkman 18:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I believe the article for it was deleted due to lack of evidence that it's being filmed. When there are press releases etc, I'm sure it will be added. --Wirbelwind ヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 21:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I was actually referring to the OVA.... But there is a link hidden in the article.--Marhawkman 21:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Mention in Popular Culture
I separated this section from the Appearances sectin because there's a distinct difference between Tekken clearly being represented outside of the video game medium, and having passing mention in popular culture like songs or television. However, this list is becoming cruft for fans, and I don't think it has a place in the article. King Zeal 20:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

Move to Tekken (series) (although I'd like a more general discussion about series-of-anything named after the 1st edition). Duja ► 08:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Tud123 has requested above that this article (currently at Tekken be moved to a location where it will not be confused with Tekken (video game), which is nominally titled Tekken, not Tekken 1, I believe. Although that is a stub that has recently been split off from this article (which I understand to be about the series as a whole), the idea has some merit, so I bring it here to the usual editors to decide. Options mentioned already (that fit the capitalization scheme on Wikipedia) include Tekken (series) and Tekken series, but other suggestions are welcome. Please indicate a preference, if any, if you support such a move. -- nae'blis 19:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Polling

 * Approval voting is a fairly painless way to do open-ended polls like this. List an option below if you support it, and sign your name to any and all options you support. You can add new options to the list; if you oppose any move to any title, sign under the blue link Tekken. -- nae'blis'' 22:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Tekken series


 * Tekken (series)
 * See the related poll this poll. Jecowa 23:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The new de facto standard, one that I support. Hbdragon88 02:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Aphasia83 03:24, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The general standard for this kind of thing. --PresN 21:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The general standard for this kind of thing. --PresN 21:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Tekken (video game series)


 * Tekken (the current title, no change)
 * Oppose - move unnecessary - a dab sentance (like I have added) is sufficient. -- Beardo 04:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose - move unnecessary - a dab sentance (like I have added) is sufficient. -- Beardo 04:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Discussion
Move requests with no specific move target are a little tough to manage. (If 4 people support A, 2 people support B, and 4 people oppose, where's the consensus?) I suggest you pick one and re-list the move. Tekken series would get my support. –  Anþony  talk  19:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually they're easy to do with approval voting. Anybody who wants to can list one they support, and anybody can vote for more than one. If one gets a clear consensus, the page goes there. If there's a consensus that the page doesn't move, it's even easier because nothing happens. Take a look at Talk:Jericho (fictional town) for an example. -- nae'blis 22:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

No one has mentioned what the most common search target would be for "Tekken". To me, that's a deciding factor for whether it should be moved at all. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:58, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

OK, I've done the move (well, I'm not positive that it was the correct thing to do) and fixed introduction links in the articles related to the series. Someone should sort other incoming links to the series Special:Whatlinkshere/Tekken. Duja ► 08:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Tekken to the 360?
I have doubts that the reports are substantial enough to have it mentioned in the Wikipedia article, but many sites are reporting that there is a possibility that Tekken will also be a titled for the Microsoft 360. Here's some of the sites: http://www.joystiq.com/2007/01/02/rumor-tekken-6-on-xbox-360/ http://www.aeropause.com/archives/2007/01/tekken_6_exclus.php http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=153152


 * These are rumors from January. Rumors aren't substantial enough, and even less so when they're months old. King Zeal 21:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Also, seeing how the arcade version of Tekken 6 will run on PS3 chips, it seems very unlikely that Tekken 6 will be released on the Xbox 360. Anyway, there were rumours that Tekken 5 would be on the Xbox, all of which turned out to be false.  Michael Mad 17:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Kind of dunny how they did end up releasing the version for the 360, which was more successful than the PS3 version, eh?Sallyboy44 (talk) 22:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


 * You're very mistaken if you think the 360 version did anything close to the Ps3 version. The 360 version is laughable compared to the Ps3's. Osh33m (talk) 03:45, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Character Appearance Table
Firstly, I don't think the table should appear in the main article - it's bulky and takes up a load of space without displaying critical information; surely it should be on a character-related page?

Furthermore, I feel that it would like more presentable if the ticks and crosses were centered (both hor and vert) in columns.

Just opinions though... 194.176.201.24 —Preceding comment was added at 15:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't necessarily agree with your point of view on the matter, but I do agree on the fact that it's too bulky. Notes like (mentioned in Nina's prologue) are entirely unnecessary and clutter the table. I suggest that we either move notes to the bottom of the table, or we remove the notes completely. The table should be based on playable appearances, not all appearances. Hardcore gamer 48 (talk) 11:53, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


 * If I haven't heard any feedback on my suggestions by the 20th, I'll be testing out a new table. Hardcore gamer 48 (talk) 09:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

This article should be moved to Tekken
I think it would be a good idea to move this article to Tekken, and the current Tekken page (the page with the list) should be moved to Tekken (disambiguation), similar to the way it was done with Street Fighter and Street Fighter (disambiguation). Your thoughts on this? - Aphasia83 (talk) 01:47, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

King and Violet
Am I right in saying that King I is not in tekken tag tournament but King II is? or is it the other way round? Also am I right in saying that violet is a character change for Lee? Samgarne —Preceding undated comment was added at 12:09, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes that is true. King I was in Tekken 1 and 2 while King II was in Tekken 3 and up. Also yeah Violet is just Lee's alternate costume and the identity he uses to get in to the fourth Iron Fist Tournament. -Notacka

Winners
Could we put down the winners of each tournament? 1-Kazuya 2-Heihachi 3- Jin 4-JIn 5:JIN! 6: ? (Let me guess, JIN!!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.170.205.72 (talk) 04:40, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, it is not sure that Jin wins the sixth tournament 'couse his an evil character. Anyway we can discuss about the winner of the fourth tournament. It is always believed that is Jin, because he defeats everybody, but he is captured by the Tekken Force before the match with Kazuya and they then fight in Honmaru after the end of the tournament. I think the real winner should be the one who won the final match between Heihachi and Kazuya. Probably Kazuya won the match because his final movie is the closest to Jin's. What do you think about it?--Kombatgod (talk) 17:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * 1-Kazuya, 2-Jun, 3-Paul, 4-Kazuya, 5-Jin, 6: ?


 * the sponsor can't win a tournament because they always fight the winner. the champion is still the winner regardless of whether they beat the sponsor. the sponsors have been 1-Heihachi, 2-Kazuya, 3-5 Heihachi, 6-Jin. and for the record, Kazuya won Tekken 4, but lost to Heihachi (though in game he won, he lost in his prologue in Tekken 5). as for the final movies. Kazuya's and Jin's happened, but Kazuya's ending didn't. --Ryu-chan (Talk | Contributions) 18:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

AGE
Can someone explain why characters doesn't age?Bettwen 2 and 3 installments passed 15 years but everybody iz the same age.It annoys me much.Pliz answer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.124.32.81 (talk) 18:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * If they would age, they would eventualy die, and if they die, that means two bad news for Namco:


 * If most of the characters die, Namco will have to create new characters to replace the dead ones. They would have to come up with new looks, combos, story, and new abillities for the new caratcers, and that thing isn't as easy as it sounds.


 * Tekken characters have many fans, and if the characters die, that would mean loosing the game's fans, which means there would be no one to buy the new games, and than Namco would fall apart.78.157.0.50 (talk) 11:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Tekken characters do age. Paul Pheonix is older as is Heiachi and Kazuya. Kazuya is almost 50 years old and many people have passed down their legacy to someone else i.e. King I -> King II, Marshall Law -> Forest Law, Michelle Chang-> Julia Chang. Also Nina Williams and Anna Williams were cryogenically frozen. -Notacka

Slight Fix Needed
I think the last line of the lead section "The series links with the Soul series as one of the characters is a relative of one in this series." is awkward-sounding, but I'm not quite sure whether to delete or modify it. Does anyone think it's necessary, since it is mentioned later on the article?

Adrenalin 150% (talk) 06:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Mokujin's nationality?
Hello. I was redirected to this page when I was looking for a Tekken 7 article. When I looked at the cast of characters, I saw Mokujin with a Philippine flag. As I am a Filipino, I was very suprised, but soon realized that the page could have been edited. Is there any confirmation from Namco that Mokujin is indeed from the Philippines? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.175.249 (talk) 07:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Mokujin has no nationality in the series, since he is just a wooden dummy. This is incorrect and should be fixed to a no nationality flag or question mark. Sallyboy44 (talk) 01:26, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Unknown's nationality?
Unknown has the flag of Bermuda !! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tekken_(series)#Characters —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.85.30.180 (talk) 23:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Flag problems
Oddly enough, the two above posts also propose the problem of random flags for characters. Mokujin is not from the Phillipines(even though the flag is now Uzbekistan) and Unknown is not from Bermuda. I also noticed that Nancy's flag is France. Unfortunately, all of those flags are incorrect to the storyline. They should be question mark flags.... The problem may be that the random flags keep redirecting to another flag, or someones just messing with us. Any thoughts? Sallyboy44 (talk) 01:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Why are there flags in the first place? What are they supposed to represent? They are all unsourced. 71.251.42.126 (talk) 07:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

TekkenCrash
I think the popular Korean e-sports show Tekkencrash should be mentioned in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.205.162 (talk) 08:30, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Reference
If you play the game and know the story. can that be used as a reference. Emoink15 (talk) 00:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)


 * What do you mean exactly? If you want to source a plot section, a reference is required per wp:verifiability. In this case', formatted citations from the video games' quotes or scenes would be accepted.Tintor2 (talk) 01:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Bold titles in the article
After the recent reverts I wish to reach a consensus here. The bold titles are just ridiculous in my opinion and over emphasise what can already be seen with italics. I have seen no where else making something bold on top of italicising. I am using other video game articles for reference, this is not my own view.

References:      --JTBX (talk) 23:34, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

X-COM, Mortal Kombat, etc. --Niemti (talk) 23:38, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Right because 1. They are not good articles. 2. You have been editing them. Sorry try again. JTBX (talk) 23:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Titles There --JTBX (talk) 23:43, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

And so what? It's not good article neither, and never was. But believe me, before I rewrote it, was a total mess, precisely because it completely uncomprehensible (you're welcome). --Niemti (talk) 23:50, 1 June 2012 (UTC)--

No you misunderstood. I said, the fact that ones I cited were GA status, Good article status, is a better citation to use. And I added the manual of style which states to use italics, doesn't mention bold. I never questioned your other editing. Its not a good idea to use articles which you have been editing for bold type. --JTBX (talk) 23:52, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Nintendo Tekken
tekken Advance and Tekken 3D: Prime Editions are not direct ports in my opinion. They used the engine and also the character models for that, but they are really original games. Tekken Advance even has a different story. You can compare it for instance to soul calibur broken destiny or metal gear solid portable ops, where they used modified versions pf the engine to create a new game. Tekken: Dark Resurrection and Tekken 6 for the psp are different as they really are direct ports and use the same story. 178.203.28.133 (talk) 13:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://sgcafe.com/2012/05/namco-bandai-opens-tekken-museum-in-osaka/
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:44, 8 December 2013 (UTC)