Talk:Tekken Tag Tournament 2/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 11:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * I have hoped to see a good formatted reference style, but the same issues can be encountered in this article. Incorrect publishers, inconsistent date formats, redundant mention of the time, missing parameters, etc.--Tomcat (7) 12:54, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Perfect formatting is not needed for GA at all. --Niemti (talk) 23:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Reception could be better but I had no hand in this. --Niemti (talk) 00:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * "Features suggested by Katsuhiro Harada include recording" - outdated information?
 * "The Wii U Edition will feature an exclusive Mushroom Battle" - also outdated as already released in North America
 * The lead does not seem to summarize the article. Perhaps add a few sentences about its marketing/promotion, and perhaps state what exactly was praised.
 * Make sure you update the whole article.
 * There are several dead links, eg Ref 40.--Tomcat (7) 11:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

I must comment that the third image, of the special edition, does not have a proper fair use rationale. The rationale describes the contents of the image, not why it is important. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 04:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Tenses updated, lead extended (a bit), image removed, also some more stuff. --Niemti (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)