Talk:Telegeodynamics

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability
Is this really notable enough to have its own article? The current text lacks citations and is anyway somewhat incoherent. The only citation is to a book that is not generally accessible. The "Further reading" item is not obviously related to the topic. Searches on Google Scholar and Google Books failed to find anything substantial. I suggest that this page is redirected to the relevant section in the Tesla article. Mikenorton (talk) 11:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)


 * User:Fountains of Bryn Mawr proposed that the article be deleted.


 * I contested that proposal when I quickly found a few book sources:, , ~Kvng (talk) 16:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)


 * All of those citations are to books about Tesla, which all unsurprisingly mention his proposal. None of those are sufficient in my view to justify a standalone article on the topic as it remains just a proposal, no working system was ever produced. I still think that a redirect is the best way forward and will do that unless someone comes up with good reasons why not. Mikenorton (talk) 12:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Agreed, there is nothing here "beyond a mere trivial mention", and that is in Tesla sources. It has no traction outside the Tesla world re: Reflection seismology. This piece of trivia added by Tesla fans should be redirect to Nikola Tesla Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 15:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Replaced with a redirect. Mikenorton (talk) 16:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)