Talk:Telelogic/Archives/2013

I respect your vision Sir but you could hav deleted relavent parts only!!
I agree Mr Pickpocket. I used to be able to go to this site to find the meaning or tranlation of the acronym D.O.O.R.S. but you apparantly have deleted that. Maybe it was too slanted towards business? Please be careful not to throw babies out with bathwater.Patnclaire (talk) 16:36, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Yet Again?
I've cleaned this article up again, as it's apparent that it's devolved into nothing more than an advertisement - Whoever you are, please understand that Wikipedia is not a place to put your sales pitches, original research or personal praise for the company like:
 * Telelogic organizations increase revenue by developing products that meet customer requirements; reduce costs by aligning IT with organizational objectives; achieve program milestones within time and budget; ensure high-quality development processes that meet industry standards

Find sources for that kind of stuff, or find another place to post it.

PocketPick 23:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Peace off!!
This is Atrocious!!!,you have deleted almost every thing,this doesnt make sense to me, I have seen many companies writing the same way I have written about my company. You come from WISCONSIN(MILWAUKEE), what do u know about maket pitching anyways?. What do u know about neutrality of the topic?. I would recommend you not to take ridiculous decisions!.


 * First off, calm down. If you are under the employment of Telelogic, you hardly represent your company well when you stomp and scream on a public site like this. That being said, I've not the will to fight over this so I'll make my point quickly - The quality of the article was poor, clearly slanted towards representing Telelogic products in the best light possible. As I noted below, the material was basically an ad for Telelogic. To illustrate, a paragraph I deleted stated Telelogic products were "Award winning...combining the voice of the customer with business objectives" w/o any reference of any kind. If you think that the material such as this is non-objective, you must be kidding yourself.


 * What I left was what I felt was not a single persons opinion. The fact that the material was meager once it was edited demostrates how poorly crafted the work was. PocketPick 20:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Cleaning up Article
I deleted a good portion of this article as it reads like a brochure for company products. Wikipedia is not a place for putting your original research or sales pitches - Get references for that kind of stuff.PocketPick 20:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Other
This article needs a complete overhaul. It is absolutely obvious that it has been written by the marketing department of Telelogic. Phrases such as "product portfolio of best-in-class offerings" and "our customers" make this obvious. But even more blatant is the 3rd paragraph where it is written "contact Telelogic to find out more on how we can help.". PocketPick —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.221.238.207 (talk) 23:32, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Telelogic.jpeg
Image:Telelogic.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)