Talk:Tell Your Children: The Truth About Marijuana, Mental Illness and Violence

Nice hit job
Quite an unprofessional looking wiki article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.216.26 (talk) 09:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

This is the most shameful thing I have ever read on Wikipedia. There is no sign of NPOV at all. The article has the title of a book, but consists entirely of criticism of the book. EasilyAmused (talk) 00:32, 5 June 2020 (UTC)


 * From what I can see, the article is well sourced. Stix1776 (talk) 12:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Anyone wanna dispute this? Do we add an NPOV tag? 69.113.233.201 (talk) 19:07, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Three-year-old vague generalizations don't justify adding an NPOV tag in my view. -- Pemilligan (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

NPOV
I've added an NPOV tag. The first paragraph mentions criticism of the book, then the criticism of the book section is longer than any synopsis or description of what is actually in the book.

As a result, I don't know what's actually in the book. This article is very slanted. 125.239.149.121 (talk) 01:38, 6 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Neutral Point of View is NOT what most new editors think it is. WP:NPOV: "which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." - When all the sources say that this book is full of non-scientific falsehoods, that's what we report. --- Avatar317 (talk) 01:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)