Talk:Temasek Junior College

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

General Cleanup
I have cleaned up the article of general crap, however, I would like constructive feedback on what could be added in in dribs and drabs. Please do NOT simply undo all of my edits in one sweep. I have already provided comprehensive reasons for my edits - for example, use of first-person language, bias tone, and unencyclopedic information. For example, the entire section explaining the Singapore A-level system is completely unnecessary, as it belongs to the article on Singapore's education system. Also, there was a section about the school logo looking like a mushroom - again, completely inappropriate. Overmage (talk) 15:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Please reach community consensus prior to making large edits. -- Île_flottante~Floating island   Talk  15:27, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

regardless:

WP:Rollback

The 'rollback' links provided by Wikipedia's interface provide a standard edit summary of the form "Reverted edits by X to last version by Y". These should be used only to revert edits that are clearly unproductive, such as vandalism; to revert content in your own user space; or to revert edits by banned users. Reversion for other reasons should be accompanied by an explanatory edit summary, and must therefore be done by a different method.

so a rollback was entirely inappropriate. Please do not abuse your rollbacking permissions.

While a major edit merits discussion, it is not mandatory.

See Don't_revert_due_to_"no_consensus". Overmage (talk) 15:58, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Incorporation of article Temasek Academy

 * Temasek Academy covers a small portion of the history of Temasek Junior College. It is a defunct programme that existed for a couple of years only and is now part of the College's Integrated Programme. Also, the article is outdated for years and only cited 1 source. Being as a stub article, it is viable to merge it into the main article instead. Muggershell (talk) 01:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)