Talk:Temple, London

Infobox/Westminster
I tried everything I could think of to get it to include Westminster, but it won't allow it. MRSC (talk) 19:01, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Same here. It's because Greater London (i.e. the London boroughs) is one infobox dynamic (as such) and the City of London is another (showing as "sui generis" rather than district or London borough - which is of course only correct). Shame really. Still, the Temple's heart is on the City side of the area, so the City of London should be the one mentioned in the infobox. David (talk) 19:04, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Temple Church
The article for Temple Church links to this website as a source for the proposition that it is a royal peculiar: https://www.innertemplelibrary.org.uk/inner-temple/history/temple-church/ The other source we have, p. 61, says that it does not "appear to be" a royal peculiar, which sounds like the author is uncertain. I propose to amend the article to say that the Temple is a royal peculiar. After all, they should know. Richard75 (talk) 11:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC)