Talk:Temple architecture (LDS Church)

Image or drawing of a temple baptismal font
I would love to see a photo or drawing of a baptismal font. Also, I read that some of the smaller temples actually have only 6 oxen with a mirror reflecting the remaining six. I can see how this is possible, with the lower part of the font in a room below that you can only look down into. Bytebear 19:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Additional reference

 * Andrew, Laurel B. (1978). The Early Temples of the Mormons: The Architecture of the Millennial Kingdom in the American West. SUNY Press. ISBN 0873953584.

The full text seems to be available on google books at the above link - or at least everything I searched for was available :) -- Trödel 03:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

cleanup tag
I'm adding a cleanup tag to this article, the length is horrendous and quite redundant at times, it could be a little more terse in the wordiness of descriptions. I think it needs more attention to the "voice" of the article being consistant throughout it almost seems as though whomever was writing got tired toward the end of the article...it shows that bad. The article is good but rambling at times, and then nitpicking in other places. I will try to help, but I'm not much for wholesale revisions. Twunchy 07:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * There's been a lot of cleanup since the tag was added (about 40-50 edits), and I just cleaned up two sections as well as changed the layout at the top of the article. The article could still probably be improved (like any article), but it seems to be good enough now that it doesn't need a Cleanup tag, so I have removed it. Bhludzin 04:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

List vs Table
I prefer a simple bullet list rather than a full table. There are too many articles with full temple lists, and this article is not designed to be a detailed list like other articles. We can also reduce size by having two columns. Bytebear 04:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of large quantity of text
Editors keep deleting large chunks of text from this article without a clear explanation for why. Please do not make mass deletions without first discussing it here on the article talk page. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 22:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The Nauvoo Temple section is just copy & pasted from the Nauvoo Temple article. See WP:SS for a primer on Wikipedia article style. Vagary (talk) 16:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Newport Beach and Redlands
This article claims that the Newport Beach and Redlands temples are based on the 1990s-2000s cookie-cutter design. That is inaccurate; they have much different exteriors inspired by Spanish mission architecture  Purpleback pack  89  ≈≈≈≈  00:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Direction
My name is Khothatso David Shou, from south Africa. I am a member of LDS from Khutsong Branch and now I am currently in Hong Kong due to work. I would like to continue praying in my church. Can I be given an address or the contact number so I can visit the church. Thanks in advance hope to here from you soon. KD Shou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kshou (talk • contribs) 16:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Please see User talk:Kshou for a reply to this request. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 15:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Sourcing Problems in Article
Several sources within the article have some incorrect information about Latter-day Saint temples and their architecture, this was posted in a comment to a blog, indicating that some of that incorrect data was used as the basis for an architectural review of the recently-completed Philadelphia Pennsylvania Temple.

Irritation, people. When Wikipedia came up in conversation here last week, I read some of the more general LDS wiki pages; which are awful. They are as deep as 5th grade reports and strange as well. In the LDS Temple Architecture page an author of a book about Solomon's Temple is the source given for saying that the Salt Lake temple is meant to emulate the temple of Solomon, and faces Solomon's Temple/Jerusalem. Why would someone allow an author trying to lend more current-day import to the topic of his book be used instead of the numerous sources that say LDS temples have an eastward facing preference wherever in the world they are built? Why the tendency toward the obscure and clearly biased, Wiki writers?

Now, I'm reading an article by an architectural critic out of Philadelphia, linked from the news page of Rick's LDS Temples site, dated August 2, and she has pulled from the Wikipedia page and repeated in her article that the LDS prefer to have their temples face Jerusalem! I thought Wikipedia was widely not considered a scholarly source. Why, if she is an architectural critic did she not notice that in the same page Wikipedia calls the Nauvoo Temple 'Greek Revival' and think, "Wait, this page is all crap."?

Wikipedia needs cleaned up.

Source: ldschurchgrowth.blogspot.com, comments on 'July 2016 Newsletter' post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:500:D01:A0CB:61AD:F98:C6F9 (talk) 02:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Feel free to help clean this article up by adding citation needed templates, removing unsourced material, among other fixes. This article is large and decently written but is clearly original research, and your concerns are certainly valid. :)  Andrew. Z. Colvin  •  Talk  01:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 11 October 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Consensus against move. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 08:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Temple architecture (LDS Church) → Architecture of the Temples of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints – use of proper name of the church vs nickname Jared kearns (talk) 07:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Hhkohh (talk) 07:36, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The proposal title is long so we should discuss first Hhkohh (talk) 07:36, 11 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose Existing title is appropriately concise. Per WP:UCRN - "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name" AusLondonder (talk) 08:28, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose Request appears to be driven by recent emphasis by the church's president to use its full name. The current title is appropriate use for WP - see MOS:LDS.  The broader issue of the church's name across WP is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Latter Day Saints. ChristensenMJ (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose Agree with previous comments. Further, the church's style guide does not apply outside of their own media. --JonRidinger (talk) 16:55, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.