Talk:Templeton Rye

Reads like an advertisement
I love Templeton Rye. It's quite good. But this entry reads like a corporate website, not like a Wikipedia entry. It might be good to move this closer to a neutral POV.

65.190.82.130 (talk) 17:18, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The vast majority was copied verbatim form the company website and thus in blatant violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. --Bobak (talk) 22:41, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not an advertising channel
Twice in the past few days the article has been replaced by extracts from a company press release. The current article contains reliably sourced third-party content. The replacement stuff is not. The replacement stuff also wipes out the unsavory recent history. — Laurain611 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. . If that SPA editor wants to add some pertinent reliably sourced third-party content that would be fine. Contributions to Wikipedia are encouraged. But what has been going on is not contributing. M.boli (talk) 02:29, 10 March 2018 (UTC)