Talk:Tempora software

I think as the Tempora timesheet product has been in development for 15+ years it is a relevant article. There have been a number of press releases on it from The Drum PR and Brighton SEO journalists. Originally it was developed by Bartle Bogle Hegarty (BBH), so is part of that companies history too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkPoston (talk • contribs)


 * On Wikipedia, we demonstratenotability with references to "significant coverage in reliable, independent sources]." I don't see any of that for Tempora. I think moving this article to a section on Tempora in the article on BBH would be appropriate. If not, and if no more references are forthcoming, I will probably [[WP:AfD|nominate the article for deletion.


 * I see you are employed by Tempora, which means you have a conflict of interest. Please read and respond appropriately to the polices at WP:COI. ubiquity (talk) 09:37, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Sure, I'm sorry for breaching guidelines. If you choose to mark the article for deletion that is understandable, I will check if there are any independant references or sources. Thank you for pointing out the guidelines to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkPoston (talk • contribs) 09:52, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I appreciate you being so cooperative and responsive. There are a lot of guidelines, and often newcomers aren't aware of them all. If you can find some appropriate sources, we'll leave it alone. If not, how about if we just move it to a section in the BBH article, with a redirect (that way people will still be able to look up Tempora, but they will get taken to its section in the BBH article)? If you feel there might be good sources out there, but need more time, you can move the article to Draft:Tempora software or User:MarkPoston/Tempora software where you can work on it at your leisure without intervention from other editors. ubiquity (talk) 11:00, 12 October 2016 (UTC)