Talk:Tempur-Pedic/Archives/2011

PoV
The point of view seems very much supported by the manufacturer, and does not seem neutral. --68.97.75.170 03:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree that a significant bit of the article seemed supported from the manufacturer, but what I tried to do was take generic, objective information from their investors' information page, in terms of company information and earnings. Other unsupported statements were removed and will continued to be removed. If you have a resource that depicts the history, earnings and business of this company that is not the company's page itself, please feel free to update this article and use it! Thanks! WiiAlbanyGirl 19:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

What part of this content still seems biased?--Angiepea 19:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Nothing seems biased as of current. I think it is time to remove the advertisement banner. (Redcrate (talk) 11:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC))

"TEMPUR material" misleading title
Looking for an explanation of what type of material TEMPUR is (gel, foam, etc.) and a little information about its chemical components, I found a product history and publicity track record. This title, I feel, needs to be changed. I would suggest: "TEMPUR material commercial history" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holzensp (talk • contribs) 12:56, 23 December 2009

fixed it. TEMPUR is a marketing term for viscoelastic polyurethane foam. Thanks 67.194.71.212 (talk) 21:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC)