Talk:Ten$ion

Title
It's unlikely that a serious source would include stylisms like $ in a title for this album. WP MOS is generally not to do so either. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Tension (Die Antwoord album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100217032215/http://www.ariacharts.com.au:80/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1G50 to http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1G50

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 4 September 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Tension (Die Antwoord album) → Ten$ion – WP:TMRULES ("When a name is almost never written except in a particular stylized form, use that form on Wikipedia"). Sources consistently write this with stylized s as $. Additionally, this would be WP:NATDIS (albeit of a term that is already the WP:COMMONNAME) and is an easily distinguishable WP:SMALLDETAIL. SilverLocust 💬 16:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 162 etc. has disagreed with this move by Miklogfeather for reasons that are not clear to me. And In ictu oculi disagreed above because the sources in this article are apparently not "serious". SilverLocust 💬 16:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per nom and WP:SMALLDETAILS. FWIW, I think 162's point was that the move was not uncontroversial, and regardless of their views on the matter, wanted it discussed, which is completely reasonable. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)