Talk:Ten Thousand Buddhas Monastery/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

I'll take a look and jot notes below - I will make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 *  ...who moved to Hong Kong almost two decades before in 1933 .... from where?
 * Added "… from mainland China …". —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)


 * (as detailed in the subsequent Architecture section). - you don't need this. Also needs a ref
 * Fixed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)


 *  in a brochure  - redundant. I'd remove it.
 * Removed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)


 * ''as having "undermined" the building's historic "authenticity". - there will be words that can be used for "undermined" and...what is "authenticity" supposed to mean anyway. Style?
 * Changed to "compromised". I think authenticity here refers to its original vibe/atmosphere, which will inevitably be lost whenever an extensive renovation takes place. —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2017 (UTC)


 *  Although the temple was "partly reopened" a few months after the mudslide - can be dequoted using different words
 * Changed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review! I've addressed all the comments you've made so far.  I also added some more info about the Monastery's history with my last edit to the article.  Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources: (NB: Earwigs copyvio detector was negative/clear
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: - the only issue here is about gallery use. I'm not normally keen on them, but this is a visually diverse place, and do feel that on the balance of things this adds to the article.

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: pass. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)