Talk:Tenchu

Untitled
guy number1 -Removed the Naruto rubbish. Tenchu came out before the anime.

guy number2 -Kakashi's appearance and certain aspects of his personality are inspired by Rikimaru, its been discussed all around tenchu forums and naruto forums. I honestly dont know why you deleted that part of the trivia based on the fact that tenchu came before naruto. It did not imply otherwise.

The Year

 * What year or years does Tenchu take place in? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.224.231.63 (talk) 07:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC).
 * The exact year is never reveled. Seano1 22:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Is there anything at all in all the stories that would make it seem that it takes place like during the Sengoku Period or the Tokugawa Shogunate?


 * It is in the 16th century. The official trailer of Tenchu: Return from Darkness confirms this.--JCD (Talk) 11:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VampireWraith (talk • contribs) 05:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Correction
"Onikage's move impressive technique is a special grab move where he siphons the player's blood screaming "I LOVE IT!". This move looks like the sort of move that would drain health to restore his own, but it doesn't." Actually, the move does restore his health. James:The Four Faced 07:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

How did Rikimaru get his scar was it Tatsumaru or Onikage that scarred him and in tenchu time of the assasins his left eye is closed


 * It was Tatsumaru who gave Rikimaru the scar on his left eye.


 * No, it was Lady Kagami who gave Rikimaru the scar over his eye.


 * Tatsumaru and Rikimaru fought each other in Tenchu 2: Birth of the Stealth Assassins and Tatsumaru gave Rikimaru the scar on his eye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.60.40 (talk) 13:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Name Meanings
This section seems superfluous and more a lesson in Chinese characters than being anything relevant to the game. Considering that very little effort has been made with the names beyond nonsensical direct translation (i.e. "Tajima Eigorou (田島　英五朗) = Rice Field Island, Excel fifth cheerful boy"), this section should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.122.198.124 (talk) 06:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I couldn't disagree more. If the inclusion of so many translations bothers you this much, perhaps you should attempt to edit the article to make it flow more smoothly.  But Rikimaru is a character who has appeared in many video games and he has a rich history; therefore I think that he deserves his own page.

Merge proposal for character articles
I support the merge proposal for Rikimaru. This article doesn't meet the wikipedia general notability guideline that the topic is covered in reliable sources independent of the subject. I encourage someone to follow through on the merge proposal. Randomran (talk) 03:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * IMWO, I think it'd be 'ALOT' better if the characters section be moved to a List of Tenchu characters article. Rikimaru and Ayame's visual appearance are repeatedly mentioned everywhere in the articles. Also, the Tenchu:WoH article is somewhat out-universe because the character section expands to almost all through the series, like mentioning Tenchu Z and other.--JCD (Talk) 04:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

2 more for the wii??
I can't actually find them right now, could anyone link me to this statement of the game's company?--JCD (Talk) 00:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Windows or DOS
We need to show if this games was available for Windows or DOS or Both. Jack of All Trades ~Wolf~ (talk) 14:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Why is it locked??
Also, could anyone add: Ayame - Tenchu Wiki to Ayame and Rikimaru - Tenchu Wiki to Rikimaru?? Someone's retarded bot is reverting for no reason! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.145.185.229 (talk) 10:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Removal of "Petition for a new tenchu game"
I am not really sure how relevant a fan petition is to an encyclopedia article on a franchise, it is not informational and the section reads as an advertisement to sign the petition instead of simply stating facts of its existence (which alone would likely qualify for removal due to a low amount of relevance to the article). I propose this section be removed as it adds no value to the article and instead appears to be an advert. 2602:3F:E381:7C00:1DC1:CB5B:F7D6:66F5 (talk) 06:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)