Talk:Tendinopathy

Tendinosis
Should tendinosis not have its own article or section at least? This article has a nice explanation, but I do not feel comfortable to write about this as I do not have a medical background: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312643/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfgang-gerlach (talk • contribs) 14:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

spelling
Both i and o are correct, but could we agree on one of them? --92.208.247.86 (talk) 11:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Nutraceuticals
This recently added section looks like a promotion, tagged. Best 78.15.161.228 (talk) 20:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Let's get the numbers right
The second paragraph of this article starts, "Three terms have evolved in the medical terminology to refer to injuries that cause tendon pain:" and it then goes on to list five terms as bullet points.

Perhaps there is a historical reason why this has happened - maybe an editor accumulating the two later terms into the bullets from following text. So perhaps they deserve a different bullet list with their own introductory clause. But whatever the reason or however it might better be expressed, it doesn't read well at the current time.

Since I am not any kind of subject expert, it would probably be better for an editor who is more knowledgeable to perform the necessary textual surgery. Hedles (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Prefered term
This is the preferred term per MeSH with the other two being technically slight narrower but often used synonymously. https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?ui=D052256 Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 07:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Number of alternative names in the first sentence
Generally we just pick two and put the rest in the infobox. There are lots. I do not care which two. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)