Talk:Tennessee State Route 397/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 420Traveler (talk · contribs) 14:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Will be reviewing soon. -420Traveler (talk) 14:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review. Before you start, I thought I might let you know that I could not find any freely licensed images of this route anywhere. While this certainly isn't required but only strongly encouraged, nearly all highway GAs have images. It will probably be a month or so, but I will take a picture as soon as I can make it over there again. Bneu2013 (talk) 23:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * - Are you still planning on reviewing this article? No hurries, just wanted to make sure. Bneu2013 (talk) 02:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

Gonna take this over. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 00:23, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Questions


 * 1) Is there any data regarding past years' traffic data? I wouldn't expect to get the history of the traffic data, but if there was, say, significant variance from 2020 to 2021 to 2022 it might be worth discussing.
 * 2) The database provides statewide traffic data back to 1985. Given how much Franklin has grown in the years since the route opened, the traffic counts have most certainly increased yearly, with the exception of maybe during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. I haven't looked at the history yet, but if there was any drop in traffic due to the pandemic, I don't know that we need to mention this, as this occurred with nearly all roads. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * 3) Were you able to take any photos of the route?
 * 4) Not yet, and I still haven't been able to find any freely licensed photos online. I will get some as soon as I can, which hopefully won't be long. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)


 * - responded to questions. Bneu2013 (talk) 06:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All right, I'll finish the review soon. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 06:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Looks solid. Passed, and just add the image when you can. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 06:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Bneu2013 (talk) 06:42, 25 May 2023 (UTC)