Talk:Tennessee State Route 68

Disputed
The official TDOT map and signs both appear to show only primary shields. --NE2 22:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Agree with NE2, the entire route is utilizing only primary shields (spot checked using Google Streetview) and is also listed as primary on TDOT state and county maps. --WashuOtaku (talk) 23:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and remove the secondary shield. ACase0000 (talk) 04:10, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Maybe next time you shouldn't revert just because "USRD editor said that it was". --NE2 13:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * , the gloating is uncalled for, please keep things civil. --WashuOtaku (talk) 14:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not gloating, just pointing out that you should be more careful with reverts. --NE2 14:27, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Also in conjunction with what WashOtaku said. Don't be so rude. I was just putting it back because an Admin had put it there. ACase0000 (talk) 14:36, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * What does being an admin have to do with article content? --NE2 14:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * PS: you put it there, in the first edit to this article. --NE2 14:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * What does an Administrator have to do with article content? Well, let me tell you:

I put it on their because 1. It is on the state routes list and an admin said that I should put the way I did. ACase0000 (talk) 14:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1. They are in charge.
 * 2. They can block You.
 * 3. They Can do what ever they want.
 * Correct answer: nothing. Admins have no special powers over article content. Reverting a correction because you think an admin told you it should be wrong shows poor judgment and may be vandalism. --NE2 15:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Quiet being so rude, go to the list of TN state routes, that is where I got it was secondary. And just to be Clear, I have never vandalized anything. I always try to stop other users from doing it. Have a Nice Day!! :) ACase0000 (talk) 17:35, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I fixed it there. Are you going to revert me because there's a third place you got that from? --NE2 17:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I did not put that there. I guess the user who created the page did. ACase0000 (talk) 01:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Corrected the "Major Intersections" portion of the article to show Meigs not McMinn in the major intersections list. McMinn county doesn't have a single major intersection (major intersection being defined as State highway or higher) with highway 68 within it boarders. McMinn was listed as the county with the intersections of State highways (304, 305, and 58) All 3 of these highways intersect highway 68 within the county of Meigs, not McMinn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.72.211.52 (talk) 15:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)