Talk:Tensilica

Early comments
This looks like an advert - not up to Wikipedia's standards of neutrality

I came across this article just now (Dec 18, 2010), and while some sentences do sound like they've been lifted from Tensilica's product sell-sheets and promotional material, the overall article is not so tainted that it warrants a rewrite (or removal.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.60.55.64 (talk) 16:15, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I would say the jargon factor is worse than promotional tone. At least the lead should be in English, with acronyms spelled out on first use in the body, where the details could go. W Nowicki (talk) 23:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

I was surprised that the link to Cadence pointed to the company's homepage rather than to their Wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.240.193.13 (talk) 15:33, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Perhaps was fixed? In the text the links should be WikiLinks, while the infobox can have web links. W Nowicki (talk) 23:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Restored some content
More work needs to be done, but article needs mention of Xtensa IP CPU (a CPU provided as Intellectual Property to companies that want to make chips partly based on it) beyond the diagram, and most especially the very popular ESP chips that use it. Much more work needs to be done, I removed all the peacocking I saw, will keep the "reads like an advertisement" warning until I can do more in the coming weeks/months. Hga (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

As far as I can see, the article is now good enough that the "contains content that is written like an advertisement" template could be removed. Does anybody disagree? If so, what exactly needs to be changed? Insulation2 (talk) 09:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)