Talk:Teresa Ghilarducci

Article quality
God, what a horrible article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.15.34 (talk) 19:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

I agree, it was. How is it now that I've souped it up? -JohnAlbertRigali (talk) 06:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

"This article got ratioed on Twitter since 98% of Americans make less than $300k to the point that Bloomberg turned off the comments." with a cite to Kyle Kulinski podcast. Seems too colloquial? Can that be cleaned up to reflect the criticism she faced in a more scholarly manner befitting this site?

What is the plan?
plans proposed in her most recent book which would allow mandatory participation in savings plan

What does "allow mandatory" mean here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.247.15.207 (talk) 12:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

It seems to me that "allow mandatory" should have been "mandate". -JohnAlbertRigali (talk) 06:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Why does this page exists?
This is a wholly unremarkable scolar with the only notable accomplishment to date being a suggestion to let your dog die of cancer. 50.125.240.246 (talk) 06:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)