Talk:Terri Schiavo case/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Juanm (talk • contribs • count ) 10:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * There are some sentence too short. Some instances of "Bush" are without the proper title, leading to potential confusion between governor and president. /(fixed at 2011-9-27)
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * One of the unsourced statements mentioned below is in the lead section
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * there are two notes without the proper cite web template.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Quotes need citation, unsorced statement in article lead needs it too (both are tagged with citation needed template). I've tagged two links as linkrot, this other one is for registered users only and so it needs substitution / link removal
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * I don't see a significative bias in the article at the moment
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Last edit war at the beginning of August 2011 about pronounciation, apparently solved.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Missing caption in infobox image.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * On hold. Please note that unsourced statements might lead the article to fail even the first B-class parameter -- Juanm  (talk)  22:16, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Term expired. I see some improvements but the major issues (unsourced statements) are still there. Upgraded as fail, confirmed the current rating -- Juanm  (talk)  06:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * On hold. Please note that unsourced statements might lead the article to fail even the first B-class parameter -- Juanm  (talk)  22:16, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Term expired. I see some improvements but the major issues (unsourced statements) are still there. Upgraded as fail, confirmed the current rating -- Juanm  (talk)  06:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC)