Talk:Terrorism Early Warning Groups

Disorganized article
This article seems to be rather disorganized. Firstly, article titles should be singular, not plural, unless there are very good reasons for doing so. Second, the article starts off by talking about a group in California, without explaining if this is the only group that exists, or even introducing the topic in general terms. The article doesn't even have a lead section to orient the reader about the topic. As a reader, editors should assume I know nothing about Terrorism Early Warning Groups and I am seeking to inform myself about them. For an article to be useful to readers, it needs to read well and flow from concept to concept. It should not be a hodge-podge of information snippets without a coherent flow of ideas. After all, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of ideas and references, the information in articles need to be curated so that it makes sense to the reader and can be understood easily. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 04:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Article should answer the 5 "W" questions
This article should answer the 5 "W" questions that readers might have about a Terrorism Early Warning Group. Exactly what words go after these questions will depend on the reader and the aspect of the topic being questioned but some that comes to mind include: "What is the purpose of these groups?", "Why do these groups exist?", "How do these groups work?", "Where are they found?", etc. While the article answers the question about "Who came up with the idea?" and When was the first one set up?", other answers are not obvious from the article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 07:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * "Who?"
 * "What?"
 * "When?"
 * "Where?"
 * "Why?'"
 * and also "How?", if it is relevant.