Talk:Tessitura (software)

Tone and POV in the Business Model section
The whole section about the history and business model of the software reads like it's been lifted from a promotional brochure written for the Arts sector. It makes several unattributed claims about the user community and the point-of-view seems to be strong advocacy for the use of the system.

Aside from that, this entire article's notability hinges on a single, secondary source.

Timbomb (talk) 03:59, 7 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, I've been rather conscious of the fact that there wasn't much source for the article, ever since I did some work tidying it up But I think I've found some, finally. I don't agree that the para that you refer to reads like it's been lifted from a PR brochure, though. When I put that together, I was trying to make a statement about what is interesting and notable about the way this org works, as opposed to most, if not all other software-producing organisations. Sadly, the website which I could have used as a source for the other cite-needed statements (and which I relied on when putting them together) no longer seems to exist, which is a pity, because it was a good source for info on ticketing systems in general. Machina.sapiens (talk)  11:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree. 2001:569:7857:4900:5045:486F:B731:51F7 (talk) 10:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)