Talk:TestNG

This reads like an ad for TestNG and not an unbiased encyclopedia style article. 146.115.38.3 (talk) 18:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

TestNG is not only for unit testing. It's generic enough as to permit other type of tests (like functional tests). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.161.102.33 (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

I agree with 146.115.38.3 on the tone of this article. At the moment, I'm wondering in particular about these sentences: Note that @BeforeClass/@AfterClass are the JUnit 4 equivalents of the JUnit 5 @BeforeAll/@AfterAll. I plan to edit this article to bring up more up to the times with JUnit 5. This does seem to be a constraint, strictly speaking, of JUnit. However, it doesn't make much logical sense to have non-static @BeforeAll/@AfterAll methods. I've never had a practical case where this would be any consideration. Thoughts on this? A248 (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * "In JUnit 4, the @BeforeClass and @AfterClass methods have to be declared as static. TestNG does not have this constraint."